Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit henry1966's column >>

HENRY1966

Perfectionist and therefore never satisfied.
Articles Posted: 232  Links Seeded: 1467
Member Since: 8/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Sheriff Dupnick undaunted by criticism from right, blasts Limbaugh

Seeded on Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:12 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: Daily Kos
politics, arizona, shooting, rush-limbaugh, limbaugh, sherrif, dupnick
Seeded by henry1966
Advertise | AdChoices

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has been under relentless fire from the right since his impassioned and impromptu plea for an end to hateful and violent rhetoric. (Though as Media Matters points out at that link, they "repeatedly praised a different Arizona sheriff, Paul Babeu, who regularly engages in vitriolic attacks against President Obama and Democrats," and revere the racist Joe Arpaio).

Dupnik has been attacked by everyone from Red State and Malkin to his home state Senator, Jon Kyl.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • henry1966's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Action Speaks, American Progressives, GOP Watch , Gut Check America, Headline Discussion, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine, Political Analysis, Politics in USA, Power to The People!, Proud Liberal and Progressive, rightwingers, We Must Change
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (499)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
henry1966

Dupnik remains undaunted by the pressure and last night told ABC News' Diane Sawyer:

"The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment he is irresponsible, uses partial information, sometimes wrong information," Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said today. "[Limbaugh] attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior in my opinion is not without consequences."

Limbaugh today railed against the media and Dupnik for trying to draw a link between the heated political climate and the shooting rampage, calling the sheriff a "fool." But Dupnik stood by his assertions.

"The vitriol affects the [unstable] personality that we are talking about," he said. "You can say, 'Oh no, it doesn't,' but my opinion is that it does.

  • 62 votes
#1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:13 PM EST
reddirthippy

I trying to figure out why all these folks that called for refreshing the tree are now running like cockroaches from their words.

  • 90 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:51 PM EST
sms29s66

red, I agree. Why aren't they out in public high-fiving each other?

  • 58 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:56 PM EST
Smith Cassidy

Uh-oh Dupnik, your target (err, surveryors marks) is coming!

  • 35 votes
#1.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:58 PM EST
Rich-2229277

One big pissing contest! I hate yellow snow and yellow politicans... Blast what needs to be blasted! The enemy across the big water....

  • 8 votes
#1.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:17 PM EST
bonos_rama

Exactly. They have been screaming about watering the tree of liberty with blood for 2 years now. Well, this is what it looks like. They got their wish.

  • 67 votes
#1.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:34 PM EST
King Dave

Asking people to believe an attempted political assassination was not politically motivated, is INSANE! And...

When one person is delusional; they call it INSANE.
When groups of people are delusional; they call it RELIGION.

  • 62 votes
#1.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:36 PM EST
TennisMom2

He criticized Limbaugh? Does he have a bullet-proof vest?

  • 47 votes
#1.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:37 PM EST
novagirl22

This points out the idiocy of People like Limbaugh. It it werent for Heros like Dupnik who were willing to say that when AZ paased the immigration laws that he would not obey the law. We need more poeple like this Sheriff who will satnd up and say if Republicans make laws, we wont enforce them. That is the American way.

So Now Dupnik is right on target and has assertained that the cause of the shooting is right wing rhetoric and vitriol( which I am not sure what oil has to do with this), just think of the tax dollars which are now saved because we know the cause of the crime qand who is responsible. Now we can begin to solve the Problem so that innocent victims like Loughner do not have to spend a life in prison because Rush Limbaugh told him to shoot this person, because of his hatred like all righty talks show host and the particular hatred for these "Blue Dog Democrats".

  • 22 votes
#1.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:46 PM EST
Physicist-retired

Isn't it just a little interesting that a sheriff calls out people 'on the radio, and some on TV', and the Right responds 'It's not our fault' and 'Democrats do it, too'?

I don't hear the left saying this.

Why such an impassioned response from only one side?

  • 49 votes
#1.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:48 PM EST
Nick46

I trying to figure out why all these folks that called for refreshing the tree are now running like cockroaches from their words.

Because no matter how hard you try to change you will always be a cockroach.

  • 25 votes
#1.10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:51 PM EST
reddirthippy

Because no matter how hard you try to change you will always be a cockroach.

and the Fer's will be around forever.

When groups of people are delusional; they call it RELIGION.

Or a political party

  • 16 votes
#1.11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:02 PM EST
rls8r

OK - I nominate Rush Limbaugh for the 2011 Gregor Samsa Award.

  • 6 votes
#1.12 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:06 PM EST
Brian-497171

I trying to figure out why all these folks that called for refreshing the tree are now running like cockroaches from their words.

That's what cowards do.

  • 25 votes
#1.13 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:13 PM EST
NativeAmerican-1289371

Stand by your guns Sheriff Dupnick--you don't have to take any @!$%# from that America-hating bastard Rush Limpballs! Fuque that hateful bastard!

  • 33 votes
#1.14 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:42 PM EST
henry1966

That's what cowards do.

And Limbaugh is their leader although running is hard for him. Too much " political " weight....

  • 29 votes
#1.15 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:44 PM EST
Idj

Lynch Mob Inciters, seldom do the dirty deed themselves. They don't even stand on the front rows, usually these cowards are on the side-lines or in the back rows SPEWING their venom! Alas;Limbaugh,Beck,Palin,Angle etc...

Ever hear these people in real debates with live oponents...NO! Fact is, they shy away from direct confrontations with those they antagonize and smear;but prefer to communicate with,ghost written books, radio shows,T V shows, sound bites,face book,twitter etc,with no Q&A call ins and no challenges to their dictates! They are indeed,cowards pandering to the gullible.

  • 27 votes
#1.16 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:46 PM EST
reddirthippy

Stand by your guns Sheriff Dupnick

Really????

  • 9 votes
#1.17 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:50 PM EST
MaryEllen Galloway

#1.:I trying to figure out why all these folks that called for refreshing the tree are now running like cockroaches from their words.

And just like the filthy and dirty cockroaches they are, they scamper and try to hide when the lights come on! They are gutless cowards.

  • 26 votes
#1.18 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:56 PM EST
MaryEllen Galloway

#1.9:Why such an impassioned response from only one side?

It is known as GUILT!

  • 35 votes
#1.19 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:00 PM EST
novagirl22

Isn't it just a little interesting that a sheriff calls out people 'on the radio, and some on TV', and the Right responds 'It's not our fault' and 'Democrats do it, too'?

I don't hear the left saying this

Democrats never say anything like this vitriol

  • 16 votes
#1.20 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:42 PM EST
Oiled Pelican

Absolutely

the right wing calls for blood and even assassination

the liberals call people stupid and ignorant but do not call for violence

therein is a huge difference

  • 35 votes
#1.21 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:43 PM EST
hard2port

Let's see now. The opinion of a seasoned law enforcement professional versus the opinion of a millionaire draft-dodger and prescription drug abuser. That's a tough one. Decisions, decisions..........

  • 31 votes
#1.22 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:50 PM EST
Patrick-1112710

So, lets say for the sake of argument, this was a politically motivated killing. Yes, it could have been just some guy who wanted to make big news, but since it was a Democrat, it must have been political in nature.

So, what's next? Put new laws into place that make everyone not say something that could be deemed as violent in nature? (screw free speech) Or make new laws that somehow make everyone much happier so this never happens again?

Do you people live in fantasy land?

What ever happened to someone being responsible for THEIR actions? Why can someone kill others and somehow it's someone else's fault?

Jesus, if this is what you want this country to be we are all in deep @!$%#.

I may not agree with many of you, and I also may not like what many of you say, but you have the right to say it, we have the right to discuss it, even argue about it. This is what founded this country. We don't all think alike, that is our strength, not our weakness.

  • 4 votes
#1.23 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:55 PM EST
lib50

Most people do think the shooter is responsible (albeit mentally ill too). Of course we all know he did it. But that doesn't mean we should not discuss the incendiary rhetoric that adds fuel to the fire.

Words matter. You can say what you want, but we all suffer the consequences. To pretend all of this negative bombast has no effect is even worse. Every time it is spewed, it should be put under a microscope and examined so everyone can see it for what it is. It may be legal, but it is not right. Shine the light on this negative vitriol. No matter who does it.

  • 21 votes
#1.24 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:09 PM EST
SCTex.Elementary

Discretion is the better part of valor!!

  • 8 votes
#1.25 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:51 PM EST
PaidSubscriber

I have to agree with a big majority of Americans that the rhetoric and partisanship has gotten way out of hand and honestly... even Gabbie commented about her district being "targeted" by Sarah Palin's PAC on the map, and how the virile and caustic stuff being tossed around could have bad consequences. How chilling to see that video clip of her knowing that this deranged individual probably was kicked over the edge by the "lock and load" mentality of radical right wing individuals like Levin, Beck, Savage, Limbaugh, Hanitty, and of course mental midgets like Bachman and Palin.

The sheriff is spot on the money, and its terrible that everyone isn't taking a deep breath and saying to themselves that words do matter.

The other side of this issue is gun control laws. I have no interest in taking away guns from legitimate hunters and sportsmen. I'm a veteran myself, and I've actually had fun at turkey shoots unfortunately using my abilities with weapons to win more than my share of prizes. But as someone who has handled a number of automatic weapons in the military, I see absolutely no need for hunters and sportsmen to use anything beyond a shotgun or bolt-action rifle with a very small magazine. Automatic handguns that take 30+ round clips have no place with the hunter or marksman. In New England there is a trial going on that deals with the death of a 8 year-old who shot himself with an Uzi at a automatic weapons demonstration. The kid's father actually consented to him using the gun. And the father is a doctor... you'd figure him to be intelligent enough to know this was stupid in capital letters.

America's 24/7 cable news and talk radio personalities need to stop worrying about ratings boosts from outlandish stir them up commentary, and they should also be asking Americans if we really need to have unnecessarily high-powered guns so easily available, or any guns available without significant background checks.

And lastly... if Sarah Palin had any brains, she should come out and lead the charge against rhetoric and innuendo. Of course, we all know how shallow she is, so I don't expect her to understand that words matter and the consequences of her screeching buzz and code words can be deadly.

  • 14 votes
#1.26 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:06 PM EST
Glo25420

When you make outrageous statements and put cross-hairs on targets diecting crazies to the person you want to "hit", then you are responsible when one of the nuts you "energized" finally takes you up on it. I blame Sarah 'Cross-hairs' Palin, Sharron (2nd Amendment remedies) Angle, and the rest of the hate mongers and liars who "inspire" the pathetically ignorant to vote against their own best interests, mistrust a brilliant and kind president, and now attempt to kill those who oppose their stupidity.

  • 12 votes
#1.27 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:09 PM EST
VeraltoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Funny how apropos a name can be -- Sheriff "Dupnik", I had to look up the meaning of the suffix "nik". Here it is:

The Englishsuffix-nik is of Slavic origin. It approximately corresponds to the suffix "-er" and nearly always denotes an agent noun (that is, it describes a person related to the thing, state, habit, or action described by the word to which the suffix is attached). In the cases where a native English language coinage may occur, the "-nik"-word often bears an ironic connotation.

So "beatnik" translates literally to "beater", but realistically as someone from the beat generation or somehow representing the stereotype.

The real question is does Sheriff Dupnik come from the ranks of the duped? Or from the ranks of those who are trying to dupe the rest of us?

  • 3 votes
#1.28 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:10 PM EST
AZPADDY

Veralto

Maybe Sheriff Dupnik is wrong and maybe he's right.

One thing is certain: No more hateful insane attacks that include any stupid gun references will be coming out of that bitch Sarah Palin's mouth from here on out.

  • 20 votes
#1.29 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:14 PM EST
Patrick-1112710

You guys that mention Palin do realize the DNC used targets (crosshairs) on a political map also, right?

And here are a few other things YOUR party did. I am not saying this is a 'one political party is at fault', but I do agree that we as people in this country need to 'tone it down' a little, but at the same time don't infringe on freedom of speech.

Here are some example of the things you guys may or may not know of that was said by Democratic people with influence.

  • After pushing the Bush derangement syndrome to such fantastic heights, especially through the use of proxies such as "The Huffington Post", "Air America", and the actual calls of violence from Chris Matthews fantasizing on air about seeing Rush Limbaugh shot in the head.
  • The Craig Kilborn Show superimposing the words "Snipers Wanted" over the face of President George W. Bush.
  • Nobel "Peace Prize" winner Betty Williams publicly stating her desire to murder President George W. Bush.
  • British film makers Gabriel Range and Simon Finch making a 2006 movie fantasizing about assassinating President George W. Bush.
  • Alec Baldwin urging the murder of Henry Hyde, his family, and ALL Congressional Republicans and their families on national television.
  • David Guy McKay and Bradley Neil Crowder, two America-hating left-wing terrorists, were arrested by the FBI after conspiring to firebomb Republicans at the 2008 GOP Convention in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • NPR commentator and ABC News reporter Nina Totenberg wishes death by AIDS on Senator Jesse Helms and/or his grandchildren.
  • Julianne Malveaux publicly wishes death on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

That's just for starters....

Also, we must be careful that disagreeing with the government is not only healthy, but necessary to keep them in check. When laws are made so that it makes any anti-government rhetoric ILLEGAL, we the people have lost.

I should be allowed to disagree, and loudly if I so desire, with my government, it's officials or policies as long as there are no death threats. Christ, just use common sense... it seems to be bread out of the gene-pool these days.

  • 4 votes
#1.30 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:23 PM EST
AZPADDY

Patrick #1.30

There is one glaring difference between what you list as Democratic transgressions and those by republicans:

The G.O.P. has perfected attack hate-speech politics to the level of a dark art form, with Sarah Palin - who isn't even a candidate for any elective office - running around the country spewing invective and exhorting her followers to take aim - complete with rifle scope crosshair - at Democratic opponents, FOX News supplying the dishonest narrative 24/7/365 and conservative think tanks and print media all forming the well known "vast right wing conspiracy" that is a documented phenomena. The collective players hardly meet once a month to formulate plans, but the narrative is well known and a matter of public record.

By contrast, all conservatives can do to try to alleviate the spotlight on their culpability in this latest attack is to list random disconnected events from Democrats.

Nice try. No one except conservative apologists are buying it.

  • 15 votes
#1.31 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:08 PM EST
Snag

If in a small room, you can convince at least one person that the person sitting next to him is evil, you have set a series of actions into effect that you will never be able to undo............how do you unring that bell?

  • 10 votes
#1.32 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:04 PM EST
sms29s66

Patrick, show me a Democratic map with crosshairs on it.

  • 11 votes
#1.33 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:20 PM EST
DEATHNELL J.

Plain and simple, Sheriff Dupnick is saying if, you put "lipstick" on a PIG, it's still a PIG! Any questions? Hat's off to the Sheriff!

  • 14 votes
#1.34 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:34 PM EST
Jensen-576947

Wonder what RL would do, if a Grand Jury supeonas him: watch the worm squirm.

  • 3 votes
#1.35 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:48 PM EST
BB-375952

Sheriff Dupnick is saying if, you put "lipstick" on a PIG, it's still a PIG!

Yep. I would agree...is he wearing lipstick?

  • 2 votes
#1.36 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:56 PM EST
DEATHNELL J.

Ok BB, I must admit...I had to laugh! "Don"t" do that again! :^)

  • 2 votes
#1.37 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:23 PM EST
Patrick-1112710

Sorry, I didnt' tivo the election in order to pull a still image off and post it 2 years later because I knew a tragedy like this would happen.

It has been said on many news stations, even stations that are not FOX.

Also, the President has stated in his campaign speeches "if they bring knives to this fight, we will bring guns". I know this statement isn't a threat or hate mongering, but it is as weak as your palin arguments.

I think a lot of you really need to quit hating so fricking hard and take a step back, breath and then look obectively at both sides. Some of you have some very serious phuking mental issues and are so hard left you are going around in circles.

  • 2 votes
#1.38 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:09 AM EST
American Latina

Sorry, I didnt' tivo the election in order to pull a still image off and post it 2 years later because I knew a tragedy like this would happen

LOL! Nice try... not

think a lot of you really need to quit hating so fricking hard and take a step back

hating? on what? Palin's pathetic ass? I think were ok, you can keep her as your queen, just please tell her to keep her ignorance to herself, grown ups need to get to work.

Some of you have some very serious phuking mental issues

And this is why it is impossible to have any civil discourse with a rightwinger, thanks for proving our point.

  • 9 votes
#1.39 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:24 AM EST
VeraltoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

American Latina, Palin's ass is probably far more bonita then your chubby tush. Did you learn to dupnik on Daily Kos?

  • 2 votes
#1.40 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:31 AM EST
mountainmike-1199289

The problem is where do you draw the line between what can be defined as "spirited debate" and hate rhetoric.

Personally, I think Rush Limbaugh is an attention whore slob that will say anything his right wing audience wants to hear just for the viewership ratings and mulit million dollar salary. He never researches any topic he bloviates on.

Yes, there is a difference. Any reference to guns such as "Reload" is a serious mistake in judgement. You have to realize there are crazy people that are listening that may be influenced. I think the right wing commentators are flirting with disaster and flirting with their fringe element listeners, such as white nationalists, KKK, anti government paranoid schizophrenics, etc... Rush probably doesn't care less about the fringe element listening to him, as their numbers count when it comes time to decide about his salary.

How far is too far? This catastrophe reminds me of a right wing talk show commentary singling out an abortion clinic doctor in one of his shows, and subsequently the doctor was shot in killed while attending church a few days later.

I don't know if Loughner voted for Jesse Kelley, the war veteran Republican candidate endorsed by the Tea Party and the NRA. It was a heated, closely contested election campaign. If Loughner had lost and Kelley won, would he have gone after Kelley? I think not. It would be my best guess that he voted for Kelley and was frustrated at Gifford's re-election.

  • 4 votes
#1.41 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:14 AM EST
Joseph.

I always enjoy these sparring matches on the Vine. I sit back and read a well documented argument from a neo-conservative, accurately and sometimes even eloquently demonstrating his point to a worthy foe from the left -- and here interjects a dumbass with a terrible grasp of the English language and barely a pot to crap on -- and I kick myself every time. I always agree with the dumbass more so than either the liberal or the conservative.

  • 2 votes
#1.42 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:44 AM EST
gillanator

Actually Patrick your examples are a hard desperate stretch to try to justify the rights advocating the use of violence. It was everywhere this past summer.

DNC used targets (crosshairs) on a political map also, right?

BS. Show a link to the DNC site using it. Otherwise it's just another right wing lie.

The Craig Kilborn Show?? You are kidding right?

As far as Bush goes? I don't know about what people said about Bush. Death threats against him are wrong. I personally get satisfaction out of seeing him stumble over attempting to use the English language. But I guess he isn't able to travel to many places outside of the US isn't he? War crimes and death threats? I think he is one of the worlds most hated.

What you are seeing is outrage from people that felt that the right wing tactics of the past year were completely off balance. Toting weapons to political rallies, physically confronting protesters, making death threats to political opponents and their families, and vandalizing their offices, and then trying to justify these types of outlaw behaviors as being fed up with the left, or say really stupid crap like:

Also, we must be careful that disagreeing with the government is not only healthy, but necessary to keep them in check. When laws are made so that it makes any anti-government rhetoric ILLEGAL, we the people have lost.

I should be allowed to disagree, and loudly if I so desire, with my government, it's officials or policies as long as there are no death threats. Christ, just use common sense... it seems to be bread out of the gene-pool these days.

and think that is going to excuse the behaviors I had listed above. No one and I mean no one is against voicing opposition to the government. But direct physical confrontation or threats of violence are way over the line. And that was the climate this past year and it was coming from the right. It wasn't condemned by Fox news or Limbaugh and it should have been. Actually just the opposite, it was encouraged. the flames were fanned.

  • 9 votes
#1.43 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:51 AM EST
DUDE-875416

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has been under relentless fire from the right since his impassioned and impromptu plea for an end to hateful and violent rhetoric.

Sheriff Dupnick is an idiot. It's one thing to "plea for an end to hateful and violent rhetoric", and it's another thing to offer an opinion before all the facts are in. He is a professional law man for over 50 years. Dupnick should know better then to play judge on national news. To make a claim like he did should get him retired real fast. Especially now that we find out the depth of the mental illness of the killer is much greater then even his folks understood it to be. That the killer didn't obsess over Fox News or any right wing radio show for that matter. Gee, he can't find a smoking gun to link it to the conservatives in America. What a surprise.

  • 3 votes
#1.44 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:18 AM EST
Sally - Snoopy's Sister

1.44 - we'll find out the facts after the trial. The news can only speculate on all aspects of this situation at this time. That is the problem with serious events like this. Fact finders not yet selected are already swayed by public opinion.

  • 1 vote
#1.45 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:28 AM EST
smittyfromphilly

All my life I though of Rush as a big clown, but now I hear he has a jet and copter, and millions of $, he's no clown!

  • 1 vote
#1.46 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:51 AM EST
DUDE-875416

Sally - Snoopy's Sister

Yeppers, we will find out the truth as time goes by. Heck, we already learned a lot since the original blaming of the "right wing" for this crime by this Sheriff. He started the whole shibang and is the spokesman for his County? I have no idea how he kept his job for 50 years with such overwhelming, non-objective, non-fact based opinions. Good thing this is a slam dunk case otherwise this Sheriff could really damage the case for the State.

    #1.47 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:58 AM EST
    AmericanConscience

    Are we too muzzle and censor anybody that makes comments that are inflammatory, if so we can start with the current President and his staff. Incidentally, the current nut-case was a left wing guy, are we to take away free speech from Matthews and Olbermann? It is simply dangerous to allow a Governmental Agency to have the power to judge what is suitable with regard to Free Speech. We have libel laws, we have defamation laws, we have a civil court system where anybody, can sue for anything, at anytime. Why would anybody want to take away freedoms because they dont happen to agree with a certain person's statements or specific forms of politics, Do you think that the Government will stop with the Right, once the precedent is set that the State is the ultimate authority with regard to editorial content - and or tone and manner of speech, all of us are silenced? Furthermore, I have gone back and cannot find examples of the outrage directed at the Climate Change crowd with Lee, (Eco-Assassin-terrorist), when he executed innocent bystanders similarly to the shooting in Tuscon? I have included for your review the hate speech that drove this mentally ill person, (Lee), to do exactly the same thing as Loughner did. I would expect complete outrage on the part of everyone that has decided to muzzle right wing entertainers, to immediately call for silencing Olbermann, Matthews, MSNBC, but especially the UN and any advocate of Climate Change?

    1. Maurice Strong, head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and until recently, Executive Officer for Reform in the U.N. Secretary General's office. His comment, "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized nations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" This quote drove David Lee over the edge and Lee became an Eco-Assassin as the shooter in a mass death execution at the Discovery Channel Headquarters. A fair question would be, if Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Coulter are to be censored for the good of society, forbidden from rhetoric that is an obvious causation of violent episodes similar to the shooting in Tuscon, then in all fairness the UN should be muzzled and forbidden from making it's incendiary remarks about the environment.
    1. The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.” - emeritus professor Daniel Botkin
    2. “Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.” - Professor Maurice King
    3. “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.” -Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
    4. “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” - Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
    5. “The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.” - Christopher Manes, Earth First!
    6. “Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” - David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
    7. “The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil.” – Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview

      Also examples of hate speech from the Left nobody seems to be upset about, as well as, the fact that Loughner was a left wing guy?

    1. Left Wing associations for Loughner - As I knew him he was left wing, quite liberal. & oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy,” the former classmate, Caitie Parker, wrote in a series of Twitter feeds Saturday. “I haven’t seen him since ’07 though. He became very reclusive.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/us/politics/09shooter.html?_r=1http://www.bloggernews.net/125845http://www.prisonplanet.com/liberal-smear-machine-backfires-after-gunman-found-to-be-occultist-pot-smoking-left-winger.html
    1. Examples of other Hate Speech, were you as offended: Rahm Emmanuel and other Democrats ridicule mentally challenged downs syndrome individuals; especially Sarah Palin as she has downs syndrome child. http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2010/02/05/liberal-hate-speech/
    • 3 votes
    #1.48 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:25 AM EST
    AZPADDY

    Americam Latina #1.39

    Boy....it sure doesn't take much to move Veralto to anger, does it. A personal attack on you basically because you disagree with him. Good thing you weren't discussing this issue in person with him....he may be "packing" as the gunnuts like to say.

    http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2011/01/12/20110112politics-insider0112.html

    An AZ. lawmaker apparently breaks the law because her house was broken into 10 years ago. Only in today's AZ.

    • 7 votes
    #1.49 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:06 AM EST
    Matt in MN

    Really?

    the right wing calls for blood and even assassination

    the liberals call people stupid and ignorant but do not call for violence

    I mean that, really?!?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm361Nbj-rc

      #1.50 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:59 AM EST
      Rowdytroute

      AZPADDY #1.31...........The G.O.P. has perfected attack hate-speech politics to the level of a dark art form, with Sarah Palin

      read about the Stockholm Syndrome.....(Wikipedia.com)......it is real......In my opinion the gop/fox, the propaganda arm of the gop has perfected this syndrome......It is being conducted over our Fed. Govt. licensed airwaves 24/7.....

      • 3 votes
      #1.51 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:25 PM EST
      Deb-658853

      This points out the idiocy and inability to speak the truth on the left. Shame on you all. Sheriff Dupnik is covering his rear end. There were numerous complaints about Loughner and the victims were told that he was being "handled" by the mental health community (an out and out lie) and that if they pressed charges it would cause more problems that it would help. That is because Laughner's mommy works for the county and is buddies with the sheriff. This is NOT, by any stretch of the imagination a product of political rhetoric and IS a product of the sheriff looking the other way for one of his cronie's kids. ALL Democrats by the way, no wonder no one wants to go there. They are screaming and pointing as much and as loudly as they can at the right to keep people from finding out what really happened. He lied about this guy being "handled" by the mental health community, because if he was, he would never have been able to buy a gun. Why isn't anyone asking where an unemployed nutcase was able to get enough money to buy an expensive gun. I'd bet a year's pay that he got the money from mommy. His parents are now saying they are shocked by his behaviour. Really? If everyone around him is saying the guy scares them to death and his own parents can't see it, how blind are they? Or is it dishonest? There is plenty of blame to go around here, but none of you have realized just where is should lie yet. You can keep this up, but eventually you'll all look pretty bad when the truth comes out, and it will come out. You guys started this fight and we BEGGED you not to go there, but since you have, hey lets get the FACTS out there where EVERYONE can see them.

      • 1 vote
      #1.52 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:40 PM EST
      Pound4abrown

      reddirthippy

      Because no matter how hard you try to change you will always be a cockroach.

      and the Fer's will be around forever.

      When groups of people are delusional; they call it RELIGION.

      Or a political party

      I think that is the allusion that was being made, that the right is less of a party and more of a religion.

      • 4 votes
      #1.53 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:41 PM EST
      Physicist-retired

      Deb,

      I have read numerous posts about Laughner's previous death threats, and even that he was in custody the Saturday night before the shootings. But I can't find any reporting on this other than conservative opinion blogs - no paper in the country seems to have reported it.

      Do you have a source?

      • 6 votes
      #1.54 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:54 PM EST
      AmericanConscience

      I saw where he was suspended from attending college because he represented a threat to others and himself. Mental illness, public threats, doesn't seem like Rush Limbaugh is at fault, but parents, law enforcement, and mental health professionals maybe?

        #1.55 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:06 PM EST
        Lynn-410457

        It is just amazinig to me that NO GOPer or Teabagger wants to admit that the hate speech that is spewed on a daily basis by Glen Beck, Rush Limberger and Hannity, is wrong or could cause anything bad. You all are not pure as the driven snow and neither are the lefties. But look back at the last 50 yrs and who is it that's been assassinated? JFK, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and John Lennon. All Democrats who worked for peace, but apparently their work was so threatening that paranoid and criminal men had to take them out. Hate speech whether it comes from the left or right has no place in this country. But you will continue to deny that anything done by your heroes is wrong, so I predict it will happen again somewhere, some place again, because when good people are silent, evil abounds. Haven't any of you learned anything from history? If Sarah Palin did nothing wrong, why did she remove and dismantle her website lickety split? Actions speak much louder than words and she can protest all she wants, but her chickens have come home to roost and she wants to explain or talk it away. Won't happen, she's done!

        • 3 votes
        #1.56 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:21 PM EST
        Deb-658853

        So far I have heard it on two radio stations. Quinn and Rose in the morning and Tom Sullivan in the afternoon. I found two articles for right now.

        Yes they are right wing, at least the bottom one is. I think the other is just a local newspaper in AZ. But since the left doesn't want anyone to know the truth, of course they aren't printing any of it. They don't tell the whole story yet, but it will come out. That sheriff is covering his butt and he's doing a poor job of it. He can't even remember which lies he's told now. He told one reporter (heard the tape) that there were complaints just before the shooting and then told another reporter later that there had been no complaints. The man is lying through his teeth to cover his own butt and maybe a few more in the mental health community and the police community. Instead of jumping on the "hate Palin, Limbauch, Fox News" bandwagon, maybe you should get some information first so you don't look like a fool later when the truth comes out.

        • 1 vote
        #1.57 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:22 PM EST
        reddirthippy

        I think that is the allusion that was being made, that the right is less of a party and more of a religion.

        Probably but I saying it applies to all political parties. They all seem a bit delusional to me and I think most americans. Just look at approval ratings for house and senate then haven't been above 30% in years and yet they claim to represent the people that is delusional.

        Most people want them to get along and do something, both continue to push divisions that is delusional

          #1.58 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:28 PM EST
          Physicist-retired

          Deb,

          Instead of jumping on the "hate Palin, Limbauch, Fox News" bandwagon, maybe you should get some information first so you don't look like a fool later when the truth comes out.

          That's exactly what I'm trying to do, so again I ask: do you have a source? I guess I should say 'Do you have a link?'.

          Preferably one that is not just opinion, because we all have lots of those, but they aren't always based on fact.

          But since the left doesn't want anyone to know the truth, of course they aren't printing any of it.

          Fox News (among others like the Washington Times and the New York Post) could report on it, couldn't they?

          • 4 votes
          #1.59 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:32 PM EST
          Deb-658853

          Lynn you left out the assasination attempts on President Reagan and Ford and the actual assination of Lincoln and Garfield. All Republicans. Not to mention the actual MOVIE that the lefties made of the assasination of a SITTING PRESIDENT, President Bush. Oh and let's not forget those who burned President Bush in efigy. How come it didn't bother you when they did that? I don't think you can get any more inflamatory than that. I would say YOU haven't learned anything from history. Every single country that started limiting speech eventually became a dictatorship and millions of people were encarcerated or killed. What the left did to President Bush was disgusting, but I would never have taken away their right to do it. The consequences of limiting speech far outweigh the danger of one nutball now and then taking something the wrong way. And this particular nutball didn't even listen to the rhetoric you all say influenced him.

            #1.60 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:34 PM EST
            Lynn-410457

            Deb, You might notice I used the words last 50 years and assassination not attempts. Don't worry you are going to be credited with your amount, nobody is trying to slight you all. Isn't the whole things very sad that we have to even be talking in terms like this? But my point is you all whine and whine and who is it that takes the brunt of most mentally unbalanced and paranoia? Its not you all, by a long run.

            • 5 votes
            #1.61 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:52 PM EST
            Physicist-retired

            Deb,

            It's been an hour and a half since I asked you to source your claims about Laughner. I see you all over this thread, but you haven't yet responded to a request for links to the claims you made.

            Either source your claims, or retract them. It certainly doesn't help anyone when accusations are made that can't be substantiated.

            • 7 votes
            #1.62 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:55 PM EST
            gillanator

            I wouldn't hold my breath Physicist-retired. You are not likely to receive a response from Deb.

            • 5 votes
            #1.63 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:10 PM EST
            Dahlia-2362973

            Deb-

            So far I have heard it on two radio stations. Quinn and Rose in the morning

            Surely you are joking? Quinn and Rose are hardly a credible news source; they are very right wing and are more like a comedy act than a serious news source -

            • 5 votes
            #1.64 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:08 PM EST
            Patrick-1112710

            Funny, I post here in a calm manner, pointing out both sides and shedding some light on what your own party has done, is doing and why both parties need to tone it down.

            All I get is BS comments, hate remarks, people denying anything and everything that makes their party look bad... sad shiit.

            Many of you rank up there as being as mentally stable as the idiot in Tuscon. I look forward to seeing you on the news someday doing something about as stupid.

            Keep drinking the kool-aid, I hear it's made with GMO sugar and we all know how healthy that is for you.

            Enjoy your hate forum, seems misery loves company.

            • 1 vote
            #1.65 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:20 PM EST
            gillanator

            pointing out both sides and shedding some light on what your own party has done,

            Patrick that is not totally accurate. You have made four posts on this seed all four on this thread I believe and they have all been supportive of the right. Which is fine. But your main point was an unsuccessful attempt to make the left out to be a violence advocating party much like the Tea party radicals. This country was not in a coma this last year and particularly this past summer when our objections to the right wing tactics which were to threaten with violence anyone who held a different opinion than they did, were either ignored or rejected. Now the consequences of their actions are making themselves felt. And the right wingers don't like it.

            This is so typical of the right. They advocate violence and spew out hate in the face of others objections. And when it comes back on them they say it was done on both sides.

            • 8 votes
            #1.66 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:45 AM EST
            taao

            gillanator

            You have made four posts on this seed all four on this thread I believe and they have all been supportive of the right.

            Let me get this straight here...you want him to support something he doesn't believe in to satisfy the Liberal need for entitlement? When did Liberals become entitled to our opinions? This is just fantastic! Liberals keep demonstrating just exactly what America would be like under their "Leadership". It would simply be all about them. We've already seen it...and we voted accordingly.

            • 2 votes
            #1.67 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:13 AM EST
            gillanator

            Let me get this straight here...you want him to support something he doesn't believe in to satisfy the Liberal need for entitlement?

            No taao. I know this is probably going to be challenging to your level of comprehension and especially goes against your political indoctrination but what I wanted Patrick to do was to not claim something that was untrue. Not be a hypocrite. He claims when he said that he was "pointing out both sides" that he was trying to be bipartisan and objective. And he wasn't! And if you were capable of reading my post you would have seen that in my reply I said he was supportive of the right. And then I followed by saying "which is fine". I just didn't think he should claim to be bipartisan when he clearly wasn't.

            So taao your whole post was for nothing. That of course would be nothing new to you and your rhetoric now would it?

            • 5 votes
            #1.68 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:31 AM EST
            taao

            Ewwww awwww owwwwww! Feelin that one! Typical Liberal hyperbole, so no harm, no foul. Let me give you a little insight concerning opinions. Everyone is entitled to their own. Just because you do not agree with them, does "not" make them unfactual. That again, is just simply "your" opinion.

            • 2 votes
            #1.69 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:21 PM EST
            gillanator

            Again I had no problem with his opinion. It was his trying to act as if his opinion was bipartisan when it wasn't. Can you understand this or should I type slower?

            Also I don't think I need you to give me my opinion. And based on your incapability to even comprehend what myself or Patrick had posted I don't think you are qualified to interpret other peoples opinion. Some people drink from the fountain of knowledge Taao. But you obviously only gargled.

            • 3 votes
            #1.70 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:38 PM EST
            Veralto

            Gillantor said,

            But your main point was an unsuccessful attempt to make the left out to be a violence advocating party much like the Tea party radicals. This country was not in a coma this last year and particularly this past summer when our objections to the right wing tactics which were to threaten with violence anyone who held a different opinion than they did, were either ignored or rejected. Now the consequences of their actions are making themselves felt. And the right wingers don't like it.

            This is so typical of the right. They advocate violence and spew out hate in the face of others objections. And when it comes back on them they say it was done on both sides.

            This is Dupnikism at its worst. Of course this Gill cannot point to anything from Tea Party positions that advocates violence. That's just a slanderous demagoguery of Loughner's murderous rampage, and amazingly Loaughner's close former friend has said he was a left-wing pot head. How the facts fly in your face Gill!

            • 1 vote
            #1.71 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:44 PM EST
            taao

            No what Liberals have no problem with...is everyone having "their" opinions, anything that deviates from that course is simply "unfactual" or unimportant hence open to leftist ridicule.

            Loved the fountain of knowledge analogy....guess I can take comfort in the fact that at least one of us was actually able to find it. Since I am gargling from it...guess its pretty obvious I was able to do at least that.

            • 1 vote
            #1.72 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:45 PM EST
            gillanator

            Dupnikism. Creating your own vocabulary.

            Of course this Gill cannot point to anything from Tea Party positions that advocates violence.

            I think toting guns, stepping on the heads of political opponents, carrying signs with threats would be considered advocating violence.

            How the facts fly in your face Gill!

            If you can provide some I will be happy to tell you.

            • 4 votes
            #1.73 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:06 PM EST
            Deb-658853

            Deb, You might notice I used the words last 50 years and assassination not attempts. Don't worry you are going to be credited with your amount, nobody is trying to slight you all. Isn't the whole things very sad that we have to even be talking in terms like this? But my point is you all whine and whine and who is it that takes the brunt of most mentally unbalanced and paranoia? Its not you all, by a long run.

            It's easy to cherry pick from one era or another and say it's all one side or the other. To be fair, go all the way back in history and you'll see niether side gets the "brunt" of it. Yes it is sad. But while you whine and whine also, you don't see it in yourself. The left does not take the brunt of it. For 8 years I turned on the TV only to hear some of the most horrible things I've ever heard about a president in my lifetime (53 yrs). But not one of you will own up to that.

              #1.74 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:44 PM EST
              Deb-658853

              Deb-

              So far I have heard it on two radio stations. Quinn and Rose in the morning

              Surely you are joking? Quinn and Rose are hardly a credible news source; they are very right wing and are more like a comedy act than a serious news source -

              I posted two links, one to a local Phoenix newspaper and one to a right wing rag I like to read AND two radio stations, Quinn and Rose and Tom Sullivan. So are you saying unless it is what YOU deem a credible news source, none of my sources will be taken as valid? Nice. Might as well not even bother unless I read the same garbage you read. It wouldn't matter if God himself wrote it, you wouldn't believe it.

              • 1 vote
              #1.75 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:47 PM EST
              Physicist-retired

              Deb,

              There are no links in your response (#1.57). Can you repost them?

              • 1 vote
              #1.76 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:51 PM EST
              AmericanConscience

              Deb has just learned an intuitive truth the hard way, civility and tolerance are reserved for those that are in lock-step with the left. List of Left oriented politicians and personalities, idolized by the left that said and did things much more egregious than right wing talk radio

              • Saul Alinsky - Father of the liberal agenda and Obama's intellectual mentor, also was a professor for Hillary and Bill Clinton, and Pelosi - advocated armed insurrection against any political ideology that disagreed with his; this is the father of liberalism in the modern political period and here is a wonderful quote that sums up his, and the liberal left's dogma:http://www.tysknews.com/Articles/dnc_corruption.htm

              "Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer."

              The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky

              • Maxine Waters - Mother of the LA Riots and her support for the Justice of rioting and the violence stemming from those riots. Interviewed in national media multiple times and excused the violence, killing and looting as justice. "NO JUSTICE NO PEACE". When the National Guard restored order so the non-rioting majority population could be protected and be free to come out of their houses Maxine said "The Military Occupation is Complete". In other words Maxine urged violence, excused it, and then in contemptuous fashion denigrated the soldiers that put their lives on the line to protect the residents of south central LA, tolerance from the left at its best. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303411604575168041790910582.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular

              Young liberals this week flocked to the nation's capital to hear, among other things, liberal television pundit and Democrat political strategist Paul Begala accuse Republicans of wanting to kill him and his children to preserve tax cuts for the rich. Paul, Clinton Staffer is famous for incendiary statements like this one. I wonder how many liberals felt inclined to commit violent acts because they are told that all Republicans are murderers, and democrats and their families are in dire physical danger?

              "All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman."
              Catherine MacKinnon The tolerance of Feminism

              "All men are rapists and that's all they are."
              Marilyn French, Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.) Good ole Al Gore and his campaign adviser accusing all men of being rapists, heck, Al Gore was, at least with half a dozen massage therapists, wasn't he?

              "You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."
              Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.) More of that civility and tolerance from such renown liberal institutions as Yale and the University of Michigan, gotta love this civility

              MSNBCtalkshow host Lawrence O'Donnell said of Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, "Michael Steele is dancing for his real master, the RNC." Racial tolerance and civility, oh boy

              The tell-all book Game Change reports that Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reidsaid America would vote for Barack Obama because he was a "light-skinned" African-American "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Everybody knows that Reid is such a tolerant soul, right?

              http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2361655/posts Chris Matthews fantasy of killing Rush Limbaugh

              http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2644544/posts Dec 10 2010 article in Salon "Kill Sarah Palin request"

              Yeah, the liberals will put everyone in disagreement with their politics on trains, enroute to camps, to line up to be marched into the ovens; but hey, the good news is the trains, the camps, and especially the ovens will be environmentally friendly and have a very small carbon footprint.

              • 4 votes
              #1.77 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:15 PM EST
              taao

              Voted up AmericanConscience! Well stated!

              • 2 votes
              #1.78 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:20 PM EST
              henry1966

              Agreed!

                #1.79 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:56 PM EST
                Physicist-retired

                Really, henry?

                You agree that 'liberals' will put everyone else on trains headed for the ovens?

                Those people marched through your country 70 years ago. Did they look like American progressives?

                Wow. I'm out.

                • 3 votes
                #1.80 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:02 PM EST
                henry1966

                The agreed part shouldn't have been on that spot. Don't know how it ended up there. Slip of the tongue.

                  #1.81 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:20 PM EST
                  AmericanConscience

                  sigh....and just when I thought we were about to share an epiphany Henry; no harm no foul, all I can do is put the facts out there, I will keep trying to stem the tide of insane Liberalist censorship and intolerance.

                  • 2 votes
                  #1.82 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:30 PM EST
                  henry1966

                  Even though we should fee united we still might differ :)

                    #1.83 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:27 PM EST
                    EdisonEllis

                    Conscience as many times as it takes I will repost this. A short litany of violent, virulent, vitriol from the right. I'm not saying they caused this person to go lunar but the violent comments and dehumanization of all those that don't agree with their wacky ideas does bounce around in the nutcases heads.

                    Sorry Henry.

                    dwillie
                    Republican Presidential Candidate first GOPer to Blame Democrats for Giffords Assasination Attempt
                    Yeah, it really couldn't have anything at all to do with the below:
                    January 2010 - Sharon Angle, teabagger candidate for United States Senate
                    if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies....
                    March 2010 – Sarah Palin, former Alaska Governor and Vice Presidential candidat
                    "Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" Pls see my Facebook page.
                    The Facebook page that had Congresspeople in crosshairs.
                    April 2010 – Allan West, then teabagger congressional candidate referring to his opponent.
                    “Let me tell you what you’ve got to do. You’ve got to make the fellow scared to come out of his house.
                    April 2009 – Michael McCaul, republican congressman from Texas
                    They fought against tyranny and oppressive taxes, do that sound familiar? We’re continuing that revolution right here in Austin, Texas today. Thomas Jefferson said the Tree of Liberty will be fed by the blood of tyrants and patriots. You are the modern day patriots.
                    March 2009 – Michelle Bachmann, teabagger congresswoman from Minnesota
                    I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax
                    March 2010 - Steve King, Iowa GOP congressman in a speech to teabaggers
                    Let’s beat that other side to a pulp. Let’s take them out, let’s chase them down.
                    October 2010 – Gregg Harper, GOP congressman from Mississippi
                    "We hunt liberal, tree-hugging Democrats, although it's a waste of good ammunition."
                    September 2010 – Political consultant Rick Winters tweeting about Media Matters
                    explain to me why the MMFA boys don't get curbstomped fortnightly?
                    October 2009 – South Florida congressional candidate Robert Lowry fired a weapon at a target featuring the initials of his opponent Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
                    October 2009 – GOP official Terry Jorgenson about congressman Tim Walz
                    I want to come through and choke the man...
                    February 2010 – Tim Pawlenty, former Governor of Minnesota
                    We should take a page out of her playbook and take a 9-iron and smash the window out of big government.[...]If you try to take our freedoms, we will fight back.
                    May 2010 – Brad Goehring, GOP congressional candidate
                    If I could issue hunting permits, I would officially declare today opening day forliberals. The season would extend through November 2 and have no limits on how many taken as we desperately need to "thin" the herd.
                    March 2010 – Michael Steele, Republican National Committee Chair
                    So let's start getting Nancy ready for the firing line this November!
                    October 2010 - Stephen Broden, teabagger candidate for Congress
                    "Our nation was founded on violence; the option is on the table,"
                    "...we have a right to get rid of that government and to get rid of it by any means necessary."

                    PALIN PUTS GUN SIGHTS ON “TARGET” MAP; URGES WE “RELOAD”
                    http://radio.foxnews.com/2010/03/24/palin-puts-gun-sights-on-%E2%80%9Ctarget%E2%80%9D-map-urges-we-%E2%80%9Creload%E2%80%9D/
                    Tea Party Rhetoric: “Nothing better than a dead liberal”
                    http://bluewavenews.com/blog/2011/01/09/tea-party-rhetoric-nothing-better-than-a-dead-liberal/
                    Save a seal club a liberal
                    We came unarmed this time
                    Warning if brown can't stop it a Browning can
                    Right wing violence
                    http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=100917659372037806288.0004828ef8239ccbe7445&source=embed&ll=42.5207,-90.263672&spn=26.708708,67.631836&z=5&iwloc=000482a5ee75915d9de89
                    Health Care Town Halls Turn Violent in Tampa and St. Louis

                    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/health-care-town-halls-turn-violent-tampa-st-louis#ixzz1AaROPuVC

                    Hate Crimes on the Rise as Republican Rhetoric Reaches Epic Heights
                    http://bluewavenews.com/blog/2010/08/27/hate-crimes-on-the-rise-as-republican-rhetoric-reaches-epic-heights/
                    Anti-Choice Terrorists Leave Dead Animals and Threats at Women’s Health Clinics

                    ''I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. ... No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choki...ng the life out.''
                    —Glenn Beck, May 17, 2005

                    ''The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel.'''
                    —Sarah Palin

                    ''Barack Obama ... chose to use his name Barack for a reason -- to identify, not with America -- you don't take the name Barack to identify with America. You take the name Barack to identify with what? Your heritage? The heritage, maybe, o...f your father in Kenya, who is a radical? Is -- really? Searching for something to give him any kind of meaning, just as he was searching later in life for religion.''
                    —Glenn Beck

                    ''I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out: Are they pro-America or anti-America?''
                    —Rep. Michelle Bachmann, calling for a new McCarthyism, Oct. 2008

                    "I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus - living fossils - so we will never forget what these people stood for."
                    - Rush Limbaugh,
                    "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."
                    - Ann Coulter
                    "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."
                    - Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform
                    "Get rid of the guy. Impeach him, censure him, assassinate him."
                    - Rep. James Hansen (R-UT
                    "I would warn Orlando that you're right in the way of some serious hurricanes, and I don't think I'd be waving those flags in God's face if I were you. This is not a message of hate; this is a message of redemption. But a condition like this will bring about the destruction of your nation. It'll bring about terrorist bombs; it'll bring earthquakes, tornadoes and possibly a meteor."
                    - Pat Robertson, speaking of organizers putting rainbow flags up around Orlando to support sexual diversity, Washington Post, 06-10-98. For the record, Orlando remains undestroyed by meteors.
                    "Environmentalists are a socialist group of individuals that are the tool of the Democrat Party. I'm proud to say that they are my enemy. They are not Americans, never have been Americans, never will be Americans."
                    - Rep. Don Young (R-AK), Alaska Public Radio, 08-19-96
                    "I don't understand how poor people think."
                    - George W. Bush, confiding in the Rev. Jim Wallis, New York Times, 08-26-03
                    "We're going to keep building the party until we're hunting Democrats with dogs."
                    - Senator Phil Gramm (R-TX), Mother Jones, 08-95
                    "Homosexuals want to come into churches and disrupt church services and throw blood all around and try to give people AIDS and spit in the face of ministers."
                    - Pat Robertson again, The 700 Club, 01-18-95
                    "Chelsea is a Clinton. She bears the taint; and though not prosecutable in law, in custom and nature the taint cannot be ignored. All the great despotisms of the past - I'm not arguing for despotism as a principle, but they sure knew how to deal with potential trouble - recognized that the families of objectionable citizens were a continuing threat. In Stalin's penal code it was a crime to be the wife or child of an 'enemy of the people.' The Nazis used the same principle, which they called Sippenhaft, 'clan liability.' In Imperial China, enemies of the state were punished 'to the ninth degree': that is, everyone in the offender's own generation would be killed and everyone related via four generations up, to the great-great-grandparents, and four generations down, to the great-great-grandchildren, would also be killed."
                    - John Derbyshire, National Review, 02-15-01
                    "The homosexual blitzkrieg has been better planned and executed than Hitler's."
                    - Rep. William Dannemeyer (R-CA), The New Republic, 08-01-94
                    "We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors."
                    - Ann Coulter, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, 02-26-02
                    "Quit looking at the symbols. Get out and get a job. Quit shooting each other. Quit having illegitimate babies."
                    - State Rep. John Graham Altman (R-SC), addressing African-American concerns about the 'symbol' of the Confederate Flag, New York Times, 01-24-97
                    "Two things made this country great: White men & Christianity. The degree these two have diminished is in direct proportion to the corruption and fall of the nation. Every problem that has arisen (sic) can be directly traced back to our departure from God's Law and the disenfranchisement of White men."
                    - State Rep. Don Davis (R-NC), emailed to every member of the North Carolina House and Senate, reported by the Fayetteville Observer, 08-22-01
                    "I'm the commander - see, I don't need to explain - I don't need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the President. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."
                    - George W. Bush, Washington Post, 11-19-02

                    October 2008. Two white supremacists planning to go on a massive shooting spree in Tennessee, then to assassinate candidate Obama, were caught before they could act.
                    Aug. 4, 2009:Jody Billingsley, Elizabeth Gannon, and Heidi Overmier are murdered at a Pittsburgh fitness club. The killer, George Sodini, is widely described in media as profoundly lonely, but some news accounts also mention his blog's racist jokes, comments on the "liberal media," the "Obama economy", and the election of "The Black Man" in 2008. ..
                    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=8258001&page=1
                    April 25, 2009:Sheriff's deputies Burt Lopez and Warren "Skip" York, on a domestic violence call, are shot and killed by Joshua Cartwright, who is killed as police return fire. Cartwright's widow tells investigators that he "believed the government was conspiring against him", and that he was "severely disturbed" that Barack Obama had been elected President. ...
                    http://www.wkrg.com/crime/article/community_mourns_officers/25642/Apr-28-2009_8-35-am/
                    June 10, 2009:Security guard Stephen Johns is shot and killed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC, by James von Brunn, a white supremacist, anti-Semitic birther with a long record of arrests and violent tendencies. ..
                    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-06-10-holocaust-museum-shooting_N.htm
                    Feb. 18, 2010:Internal Revenue Service manager Vernon Hunter is killed by businessman Joe Stack's kamikaze attack on a federal office building in Austin, Texas. The political views in Stack's rambling suicide note seem off the wall in ways that defy categorization as right or left, but he is widely and immediately hailed as a hero across the radical right-wing, specifically because his attack was against IRS offices. ...
                    http://www.businessinsider.com/joseph-andrew-stacks-insane-manifesto-2010-2
                    April 4, 2009:Pittsburgh police officers Eric Kelly, Steve Mayhle, and Paul Sciullo are killed by gunman Richard Poplawski. The killer is described in media accounts as a white supremacist who had posted a Glenn Beck video to one of the numerous hate sites he frequented, and who was worried by the false right-wing meme that President Obama is preparing to confiscate everyone's guns. ...
                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Pittsburgh_police_shootings#Political_views
                    Feb. 26, 2009:College students Nicolas Pablo Corp-Torres and Racine Balbontin-Aragondona are shot and killed and three others are wounded by Danny Baker. He is described in news accounts as a Republican Party activist, reportedly driven by racism, who targeted his victims because they were Chilean. ..
                    http://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/baker-15572-rhoads-jail.html
                    Dec. 9, 2008:Millionaire neo-Nazi James G. Cummings is shot and killed by his wife, Amber Cummings, after what she describes as years of domestic abuse. Investigators find a cache of "radiological dispersal device components and literature, and radioactive materials" for constructing a dirty bomb, and describe Cummings as "a lone, disturbed individual". His wife says that he had been especially furious in recent weeks over the election of Barack Obama. ...
                    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/10/james-g-cummings-slain-us_n_173640.htmlAug. 13, 2008:Bill Gwatney, chair of the Alabama Democratic Party, is shot and killed at Party headquarters in Little Rock by Timothy Dale Johnson.
                    Tucker says he and other classmates do recall Johnson being vocal about his views.
                    "I would always remember going to class and I would see that he had a Bill Clinton anti-campaign sticker [on his car] that says I don't miss Bill. "He would surf the internet and he would see that a Democrat had died and he would laugh about it."
                    http://www.todaysthv.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=70912&catid=2
                    July 28, 2008:Churchgoers Linda Kreager and Greg McKendry are shot and killed and five others are wounded at Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville, by gunman Jim David Adkisson. The murderer later tells police that he targeted Unitarians because of the church's "liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed". In the gunman's home, police find a collection of right-wing literature including Let Freedom Ring by Sean Hannity, The O'Reilly Factor by Bill O'Reilly, and Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder by Michael Savage. ...
                    http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/29/suspects-note-cites-liberal-movement-church-attack/
                    not to forget bricks thrown through Democrat windows , gas lines cut , phone threats ................
                    Remember When Beck Ridiculed Pelosi For Speaking Out Against Violent Tea Party Rhetoric?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOmNVBaGF0Q&feature=player_embedded
                    Glenn Beck’s Top Ten Reasons To Kill Your Congressman
                    • January 19, 2010: The progressive movement is sucking the blood out of each of the parties. This is their opportunity to finally win and progressives will, admittedly, do anything to win. They’ll lie, cheat, steal. Do you really think you can pull them off your neck with a ballot box? You must drive a steak through the heart of this movement. … [Obama]‘s not a Democrat. He is a progressive.
                    • June 10, 2010: Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government. I will stand against you and so will millions of others. We believe in something. You in the media and most in Washington don’t. [...] They believe in communism. They believe and have called for a revolution. You’re going to have to shoot them in the head. But warning, they may shoot you.
                    • November 13, 2009: Barack Obama and Congress are selling you a bill of goods. It is only when you take down the mask of sunshine and lollipops that you will see the real thing – the real image. Destruction. These bills are creating the path to America’s destruction.
                    • July 23, 2010: They’ve already taken over health care. Is there any greater control than that of deciding the fate of someone’s life?
                    • July 23, 2010: The financial regulation that the president signed into law yesterday is an unprecedented assault on our economy, our ability to do business and, quite honestly, the republic as we know it.
                    • October 30, 2009: When you pull back the curtain, you will see that free speech is being eradicated for controlled speech: Control over the media; control over the Internet; control over you.
                    • March 8, 2010: There is an effort to indoctrinate [our kids]. … Even President Obama, in his own Web site, targeting our children. … Get the kids out of this indoctrination or our republic will be lost.
                    • April 24, 2007: I have been telling you for months now that illegal immigration is creating a new civil war in this country.
                    • September 2, 2009: I’m going to show you the beginning of something that should scare the living daylights out of you. It is propaganda in America. The National Endowment for the Arts is now holding conference calls.
                    • December 14, 2009: The climate cult wants more than just your recycling bin. … what they want is total submission.

                    • 4 votes
                    #1.84 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:06 PM EST
                    AmericanConscience

                    And it is only from the right, and you are politically aligned with those interests that oppose the right, so therefore, what you are posting is a fair unbiased look at our entire political spectrum? You totally blew right past the part of my post that includes Saul Alinsky, who is the puppet master for the Clintons and Obamas. Alinsky wants to blow up schools, burn people to death in the streets, and create so much terror that the right caves and surrenders to his brand of politics. This is the father of your liberal party; Bill Ayers actually planted and detonated a bomb in the Pentagon, he is a trusted member of Obama's inner circle. The black panther party is a terrorist vigilante group that is inflicting violence on the voters to Protect Obama at town hall meetings and at voting polls, and the Obama white house is protecting them from prosecution. Big difference between talking and doing, seems like liberals and democrats are doing all the damn things that you say the right is talking about.

                    How about immigrant organizations like La Raza that advocate annhilation of Gringo occupation of their country, you dont think that is tantamount to declaring a race war; La Raza is a huge part of the Liberal establishment.

                    What about Angela Davis, prominent member of the Liberal establishment, Murderer, terrorist, (she didnt tell people to do it, she actually did it), advocates killing whitey and all the oreos, black on the outside white on the inside.

                    Obama is indoctrinating our kids, Climate change does advocate Genocide to protect the planet, illegal immigration is creating a race war, the banksters that Obama continues to appoint to his cabinet are robbing the country and destroying it, socialized health care is about subjugation of the middle class, (READ ALINSKY OBAMA MENTOR), and progressives, in THEIR OWN WORDS, WILL LIE CHEAT STEAL OR KILL TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, read Alinsky, and then Read Clinton and Obama on Alinsky.

                    so is it hate speech to say that America is under seige and its citizens in dire mortal danger, or is it simply the truth?

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.85 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:23 PM EST
                    EdisonEllis

                    Do dear boy, I'm trying to point out to you deniers that the right's violent rhetoric is almost an everyday thing and trying to minimize it is a fairy tale.

                    Then again you bring up such small points about the left it's laughable.

                    BTW I don't have to reach for my examples they're current. Yours hahahahahaah

                    • 5 votes
                    #1.86 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:21 PM EST
                    AmericanConscience

                    Read about how innocent the Left really is Edison, if you dare. I am posting the key to understanding how diabolical the Liberalist Agenda really is. Or just google Alinksy and Liberal agenda and see what you come up with big man.

                    How about the father of modern liberalism? An actual University Professor for Bill and Hillary Clinton, a self professed hero of Barack Obama; (in his own words in both biographical works), as well as, inspirations of Pelosi, Boxer, Bill Ayers (who actually built and exploded bombs against innocent people, and is also one of Barak's closest friends and influences) the father of Democratic liberalism et al?

                    Saul Alinsky - who taught liberal democrats one simple rule, the ends justifies the means. So if what liberals say is true about right wing talk show radio, (big stretch), then the entire liberalist agenda and every prominent person within today's liberalist cadre must be refuted by all of you that condemn Rush, or, the condemnation isn't about safety, or decency, but about furthering your personal politics by destroying the rights of others to listen to any opposing ideas, true? BTW, Hillary was his most prized pupil, hmmmm?

                    • Saul Alinsky - Father of the liberal agenda and Obama's intellectual mentor, also was a professor for Hillary and Bill Clinton, and Pelosi, as he was, the mentor and influence of one of Obama's closest friends, Bill Ayers - advocated armed insurrection, bombs, terrorism, and killing of innocent people as part of a war against any political ideology that disagreed with liberalism; this is the father of liberalism in the modern political period and here is a wonderful quote that sums up his, and the liberal left's dogma:http://www.tysknews.com/Articles/dnc_corruption.htm

                    "Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer."The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky in his dedication to "Rules for Radicals" a book that Barrack, Michelle, Hillary, and Bill have built their political lives around.

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.87 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:11 PM EST
                    EdisonEllis

                    AmericanConscience

                    You sound like a broken record AmericanConscience what you don't want to admit is that the Rules for Radicals is the hand book of the right wing. You just refuse to see it. Everything in it is being used by your buddies in their violent bull@!$%#.

                    • 6 votes
                    #1.88 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:12 AM EST
                    WmRAllen

                    I've always wondered how many people who use Alinsky as a stick to hit their opposition have even read his book.

                    • 6 votes
                    #1.89 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:17 AM EST
                    Denis-1291810

                    Edison-great work, keep it up.

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.90 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:43 PM EST
                    AmericanConscience

                    I have a copy and I have read it, similarly to Mein Kaumpf, have YOU? For instance, did you catch the section detailing Alinsky's contemt for the rank and file supporters, he considers them expendable. Or, the fact that any LIE, TERRORIST EVENT, MURDER, VIOLENT ACT, is justified to take political power, the ends justifies the means.

                    Denial isn't just a river in Egypt

                    but hey, when the facts are inconvenient, just deny and make your own up. I posted my link, with the dedication to LUCIFER, hello??????

                      #1.91 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:02 PM EST
                      EdisonEllis

                      Keep your head in the sand Conscience.

                      • 1 vote
                      #1.92 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:30 PM EST
                      Rahlly

                      Never even heard about this book until the right started screaming about how all lefties are breast fed it.

                      Btw... you do realize fundamentalists are radicals of a sort... they radically opposed to change.

                      • 3 votes
                      #1.93 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:41 PM EST
                      AmericanConscience

                      Rahlly, access the link, do your own research. It starts with a dedication to Lucifer, proclaimed the first greatest radical Liberal. Also read about Alinsky and how idolized he is by Obama, Clinton, and the rest of the heirarchy of the Democratic Party. Hey, if you have to courage to do some reading, in Hillary's and Barracks own words, you might learn a different version of what is going on behind the curtain.

                        #1.94 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:45 PM EST
                        EdisonEllis

                        Conscience

                        It seems to me that you are the one that doesn't read anything that's shows truth.

                          #1.95 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:50 PM EST
                          Deb-658853

                          AmericanConscience - don't forget the part in Alinski's book that says to blame the conservatives for everything you are doing. Point fingers and lie. Keep them off guard and on the defensive. Call them stupid, violent, racists, regardless of the facts. Argue emotions, not facts. That is the first page in their playbook. From what you've posted, I can tell you already know that. You just forgot to include it with all the other stuff. Great post by the way! I'm sure you know you won't get any of them to agree with you no matter how much proof you put in their face. Their first line of defense is to deny everything, no matter how silly they look. With this AZ thing, most people are laughing at them now, they look so ridiculous. All polls say only about 30% of the country believes their crap, which is the far left progressive 30%.

                          @ EdisonEllis - Hillary Clinton did a college paper on Alinski and says over and over again how much she admires him and follows his example.

                            #1.96 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 3:50 PM EST
                            Dahlia-2362973

                            Deb - you got that right - I do not deem Q & R to be a credible news source - they are right wing talk radio hosts -

                              #1.97 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:49 PM EST
                              Reply
                              greg-709692

                              He sounds like Obama and the "They Acted Stupidly" comment.

                              Sometimes, getting things stirred up, for no other reason than political motivation, can come back and bite you in the butt.

                              Ask Liberals on their rants against conservative talk show host's.

                              They spend hours and hours trying to find faupa's from conservatives.

                              Pay back can be a bitch.

                              • 9 votes
                              #2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:26 PM EST
                              Ryan-Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                              If Dupnick would have followed up on the death threats, this guy would not have been able to legally purchase a gun.

                              Dupnick would be better served just doing his job and shutting his mouth, because it's starting to look like he failed his community.

                              • 12 votes
                              #2.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:42 PM EST
                              TheJonesGirl

                              What exactly could Dupnick do? A person cannot be locked away based on a suspicion, there has to be some sort of proof and even then, a person can get out on bail.

                              Are you advocating for a police state wherein a person can be detained based on the words and suspicions of another? That's not very small government of you.

                              • 48 votes
                              #2.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:46 PM EST
                              Ryan-

                              TJG, what did I say about locked away?

                              I'm talking about making it more difficult for him to legally purchase a hand gun, because he was making death threats. Which the Sheriff could have done if he followed up on this.

                              • 5 votes
                              #2.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:52 PM EST
                              sms29s66

                              Ryan, could you cite the Arizona statute that would apply?

                              • 36 votes
                              #2.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:00 PM EST
                              TheJonesGirl

                              Making it more difficult to obtain a gun would require changing AZ's fairly lax gun laws. Is that what you want?

                              And even if he couldn't obtain one at some point, he could still have one bought prior or access to someone else's gun, either with or without that person's permission.

                              • 30 votes
                              #2.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:04 PM EST
                              Smith Cassidy

                              They spend hours and hours trying to find faupa's from conservatives.

                              I'm pretty sure that activity would take minutes, tops.

                              • 28 votes
                              #2.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:07 PM EST
                              Maricopa County Resident

                              Making it more difficult to obtain a gun would require changing AZ's fairly lax gun laws. Is that what you want?

                              Those are federal laws, not AZ laws. Just because we live in AZ doesn't make it any easier than anywhere else. We pass the same background checks that are mandated across the country.

                              • 5 votes
                              #2.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:19 PM EST
                              demmywemmy

                              Faux pas.

                              Liberal PC grammar police strikes again!

                              • 22 votes
                              #2.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:20 PM EST
                              Ryan-Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                              Ryan, could you cite the Arizona statute that would apply?

                              I love it when Liberals asks for specifics, and they themselves have no clue.

                              First, its Federal.

                              Second, if the Sherrif would have perused the death threats(felony), this kid would be either in in jail, or unable to purchase a gun legally.

                              You do understand that if you have a felony, you are unable to purchase a gun...

                              • 8 votes
                              #2.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:29 PM EST
                              TennisMom2

                              Ryan:

                              If Dupnick would have followed up on the death threats, this guy would not have been able to legally purchase a gun.

                              And if GWB had followed up on the Talking Points Memo that said, "Terrorists want to fly a plane into a building" maybe the Twin Towers would still be standing.

                              • 40 votes
                              #2.10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:39 PM EST
                              jackjack-712749

                              "And if GWB had followed up"

                              It didnt take long for the deflection. Nice try.

                              • 8 votes
                              #2.11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:03 PM EST
                              Ryan-

                              Wow a Bush reference....lol

                              • 5 votes
                              #2.12 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:10 PM EST
                              rls8r

                              Thanks demmywemmy -

                              I couldn't figure out what the heck he was talking about. I even used Google to look for "faupa" - only to find "Fat and Ugly People Assembly" on Facebook, but I thought it couldn't mean that, could it?

                              • 8 votes
                              #2.13 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:18 PM EST
                              Sebbydad

                              really Ryan, you are aware of the specifics of the case regarding threats that you are comfortable in stating that the Sheriff had clear and uncontrovertable evidence of a felony and did nothing about it? What are the specific felonies you refer to, the claim of him making death threats appears to be non-existant, the police record shows he had a run in over grafitti in 2008 and nothing else. You want to blame the sheriff for not stopping him before this happened, then i get to blame BushII and the GOP controlled senate and congress for letting the ban on 30 round clips expire without a peep.

                              and it isn't all federal. From the information released so far, until he drew his weapon, the shooter had not committed a crime that day.

                              The guy was a nut, I don't think the shooting was motivated by politics and his ramblings and reported comments go the gamut of religious extremism to govenment mind control conspiracies to constitutional delusions. It was a when not an if that he was going to go off. Neither the police nor the Sheriff's office were responsible for security at this event.

                              I am of the opinion that it has been the conservative movement that has said and advertised it is OK to bring guns to political events. That 2nd amendment remedies are an appropriate reponse to a lost election. I don't think that those statements caused this tragedy, but it is not so ridiculous to see how a line could be drawn from one to the other.

                              The riduiculous statements of right wingers that if more people in the crowd had been armed there would have been no victims, I disagree, as I think anyone who had been in a firefight would, more bullets in the air do not make for a safer environment.

                              • 20 votes
                              #2.14 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:25 PM EST
                              greg-709692

                              Ya caught that when didn't ya Demmywemmy! LOL!

                              @ ris8r:

                              "Fat and Ugly People Assembly"

                              Pretty much the Left's rant against Limbaugh isn't it!

                              • 5 votes
                              #2.15 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:40 PM EST
                              Ryan-

                              Sebbydad, I'm not a gun owner nor do I pay much attention to it. But from my understanding, you could still get 30 round clips under the Brady act just as well as you can today.

                              Also, I've seen a few comments regarding if more guns were in the crowd, and some have said that they wouldn't pull there weapon in a crowd, and some have said they would. But it's all pure speculation on their part. But one of the guys that subdued him, did have a gun, and choose not to use it.

                              Lastly, if the Sheriff wants to speculate about how political rhetoric played a part the shooting, then plenty can be speculated on how the police could have stopped it before it happened.

                              • 4 votes
                              #2.16 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:58 PM EST
                              Dreama

                              I don't blame the Sheriff. He was in the midst of a bloody tradgedy and I imagine upset that his friend (Giffords) was shot and most likely going to die. I'm sure he was emotional at that moment and besides he has a right to his "free speech" just like everyone else.

                              That being said, I can't believe that Giffords is alive and giving the Docs a thumbs up, responding to commands! That in my book is a miracle! But nobody wants to hear anything good or positive, everyone just wants to point fingers and lay blame... have fun with that.

                              • 7 votes
                              #2.17 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:54 PM EST
                              Snag

                              When you take a life, for whatever reason, you become a pawn in the destrution of humanity

                              • 2 votes
                              #2.18 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:12 PM EST
                              james ca.

                              The Sheriff is 100% correct and nobody has to prove it. It doesn't matter if Jared watched FauxNews or paid attention to Sara Palin's tweets. The only way we could be 100% correct that Sara Palin and Sharron Angle & Rush Limbaugh didn't influence him first hand, second hand or third hand - would be for Sara, Sharron, and Rush and others to not have used such loaded and blatantly violent rhetoric in the first place. They could have made every point they have ever made using more practical, every day, non-violent imagery - instead of such uniquely violent metaphors, and straight up calls to take up arms (by tea-party folk) if the rest of the United States citizens don't vote their way in the voting booth. If they had shown class, and chose their words more wisely in the first place - it would not even be a question whether or not such violent rhetoric influenced Jared to be a terrorist. And because we can not prove that such violent rhetoric and non-veiled calls to pick up a gun and kill fellow Americans by elected officials and people running for office, & people like Sara Palin with her "veiled" threats ...because we can't prove beyond any doubt that they didn't influence him first hand, second or third hand - it is safest and prudent to assume that they did influence him. Such divisive, political rhetoric can still be fully expressed toned down, which removes the possibility that any violent rhetoric might influence someone already dealing with mental issues, and which also removes any question when tragedies like this do occur concerning who is to blame. It's only because Sara Palin chose raunchy words and symbols in the first place that we are having this discussion, it could have been easily avoided if she showed class and the slightest bit of wisdom.

                              • 10 votes
                              #2.19 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:28 AM EST
                              Kathy-1571680

                              rls8r- no that would probably mean Rushpa perhaps.

                              • 1 vote
                              #2.20 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:31 AM EST
                              WmRAllen

                              Ryan, this is America...

                              You do understand that if you have a felony, you are unable to purchase a gun legally...

                              Enforcement of that technicality is another matter entirely, isn't it?

                              • 5 votes
                              #2.21 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:40 AM EST
                              Jake319

                              Greg
                              Payback is a bitch?

                              Payback, what the hell does that mean slick? You know something payback?

                              Tell me what you know.....

                              You defend right wing taking heads as if they are your heros. I-think you share the same delusions as the shooter.

                              • 7 votes
                              #2.22 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:06 AM EST
                              greg-709692

                              I-think you share the same delusions as the shooter.

                              Do you really want to stick with that insane rant?

                              As far as payback, a normal person would have understood it was referencing the outrage he is getting back.

                              Comment # 2.22 reported as inflammatory and down right stupid, if there was a button for that..

                              • 1 vote
                              #2.23 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:09 AM EST
                              Jake319

                              Answer the question . You fall back on the tactics of your heros deflect, accuse and attack.

                              Sheriff is defending himself just as you are doing but he is wrong and you are right?

                              • 3 votes
                              #2.24 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:48 PM EST
                              greg-709692

                              He's wrong because he started the politics as usual instead of being a Law enforcement officer as he was elected to be.

                              Isn't Justice supposed to be blind?

                              Law Enforcement is supposed to be nuetral.

                              • 1 vote
                              #2.25 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:05 PM EST
                              Deb-658853

                              The sheriff had several complaints and told them Laughner was being handled by the mental health community. You cannot own a gun if you're being treated for mental illness. The mental health community had not evaluated Laughner and therefore he was able to buy a gun. This is directly the sheriff's fault. And the sheriff was looking the other way because Laughner was the son of Amy Laughner, a county employee and he didn't want to cause problems for her family.

                              @james.ca - why is it OK for Daily Kos to use bullseyes on their map and Palin can't use crosshairs on hers? What is the difference? Why can the left burn a sitting president in efigy and you all think it's great? Why is it when the President calls 50% of the country "the enemy" that's just tough talk? Oh My Lord! Hipocracy abounds!

                                #2.26 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:45 PM EST
                                Lynn-410457

                                Deb, Do you know what you just said? You cannot own a gun if you are being treated in the mental health community? How are they supposed to know if you own one? They ask their clients do you have a weapon and if they say no, they do no further checking. Loughner bought his gun very recently and the ammunition on Sat. morning. Educate yourselves people before you post things. At least make them valid. Why do you feel such a need to defend Sarah Palin and her website and what she posted? She was wrong, to do that, whether this shooting and murders occurred or not. It is simply wrong!!!! There is a big difference in bullseyes and crosshairs for a gun. The Daily Kos didn't need to be putting bullseyes over sites, but Sarah Palin should not have put crosshairs of a gun up either.

                                • 3 votes
                                #2.27 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:57 PM EST
                                taao

                                greg-709692
                                He's wrong because he started the politics as usual instead of being a Law enforcement officer as he was elected to be.
                                Isn't Justice supposed to be blind?
                                Law Enforcement is supposed to be nuetral.

                                Oh greg, how you hit that nail on the head...Liberal Justice is indeed blind, deaf, and silent. Until they can attempt to condemn others for their deplorable actions...then you just simply can't shut them up.

                                • 2 votes
                                #2.28 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:31 PM EST
                                greg-709692

                                then you just simply can't shut them up.

                                LOL!

                                Ain't that the truth.

                                • 1 vote
                                #2.29 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:55 PM EST
                                Lynn-410457

                                Get used to it Greg. We will NEVER shut up, because when good people are silent evil abounds. I know you and your ilk want that, but it will not happen.

                                • 5 votes
                                #2.30 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:51 PM EST
                                greg-709692

                                Now I've been relegated to having "Ilks" instead of "friends".

                                Go Figure.

                                  #2.31 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:13 PM EST
                                  AZPADDY

                                  greg

                                  You too? Heck, my freinds have been referred to as "ilk" so often I introduce any of them as my good ilk Joe, etc. Sometimes they're even referred to as "Liberal ilk". I wonder if that's any different than "conservative ilk"? Anyway...it sure sounds demeaning.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #2.32 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:11 PM EST
                                  greg-709692

                                  Who the heck came up with Ilk?

                                  Sounds like something you'd pull off the bottom of your shoe, or a classy way of saying Yuck!!

                                    #2.33 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:23 PM EST
                                    Lynn-410457

                                    Greg, Go to www.dictionary.com and you can look it up. It means class or kind.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #2.34 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:14 PM EST
                                    greg-709692

                                    Thanks!

                                    It just sounds so bad when you say "Your Ilk".

                                      #2.35 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:29 PM EST
                                      Lynn-410457

                                      Greg, Only in your mind, only in your mind.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #2.36 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:37 PM EST
                                      greg-709692

                                      Can't help it!

                                      Those constant whispers in my ear are driving me nuts!

                                        #2.37 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:38 PM EST
                                        AZPADDY

                                        Lynn

                                        No offense, but I think we all know the word "Ilk" is used as a slur.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #2.38 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:42 AM EST
                                        Lynn-410457

                                        Greg asked for the meaning or feigned ignorance of the word, whatever. I answered with the meaning from dictionary.com. Take from that what you will.

                                          #2.39 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:48 AM EST
                                          greg-709692

                                          Feigned ignorance Lynn.

                                          Definition of Ilk:

                                          1. sort: a kind or sort of person or thing

                                          I think I should be offended!

                                          I only have "sort of persons" for friends?

                                            #2.40 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:59 AM EST
                                            Lynn-410457

                                            Greg, You have spent 2 freakin' days obsessing on the use of the word ilk. Do you not have a life or anything better to do? Jeeezzzz, give it a break. This is not rocket science or anything that is really important. I DO NOT care what you think it means, it was a remark, so????

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #2.41 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:45 AM EST
                                            greg-709692

                                            Do you not have a life or anything better to do?

                                            NOPE! LMAO!

                                            Did I get under your skin or what!!!

                                            LMDAO!

                                            Your so sensitive Lynn!

                                            I DO NOT care what you think

                                            Yes you do, or you wouldn't have wasted your time commenting back.

                                            you like me don't you?

                                              #2.42 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:53 PM EST
                                              EdisonEllis

                                              greg

                                              http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001149713/hogwash_answer_2_xlarge.gif

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #2.43 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:31 PM EST
                                              greg-709692

                                              Oh You !

                                              LMAO!!!!!!!!!

                                              Lynn does like me. I don't care what you say!

                                                #2.44 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:34 PM EST
                                                AmericanConscience

                                                TennisMom2

                                                Ryan:

                                                If Dupnick would have followed up on the death threats, this guy would not have been able to legally purchase a gun.

                                                And if GWB had followed up on the Talking Points Memo that said, "Terrorists want to fly a plane into a building" maybe the Twin Towers would still be standing.

                                                Monday morning quarterbacking is such a stupid game, but I cannot resist rebutting intellectual absurdity, (and my friend Tennismom2 is really a great source). So, GWB could have read a memo that had included a potential terrorist attack that utilized commerical aircraft flown into buildings? Ok, lets look at Tennismom2 statement and answer

                                                1. Bill Clinton had staffed the FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other Federal Agency that GWB inherited.
                                                2. We KNOW this, because Al (I invented the internet and habitually sexually assault massage therapists) Gore sued to overturnan election result because he didn't win.....(Wah Wah) AFTER he had called to claim victory 3 HOURS before all the central time polls closed in Florida, and AFTER he called GWB BACK AGAIN to concede and congratulate GWB on the Bush victory. So.....Al Gore held up the election and corresponding Bush transition team from staffing up in order to be in position to DO ANYTHING about the Islamic Whack Jobs that cowardly attacked innocent men, women, and children.
                                                3. Bill (I did not have sex with those 10 women that have come forward, I did not) Clinton and his wonderful security staff were offered Osama Bin Laden who was in custody in Yemen, Whut?? A Clinton Staffer testified before Congress that Clinton didnt want the hassle of bringing Bin Laden in because Clinton feared enhanced terrorist attacks during Clinton's watch, which would have FURTHER tarnished the Clinton Legacy!

                                                So, what did we really learn from all this, Absolutely nothing except.............That Bill Clinton and Al Gore are sexual predators, Clinton for using his position to pursue a Lewinsky from Monica, and Al that has had about a dozen Massage Therapists come forward testifying that Gore in full Nude Glory, chases them around the room with his "Dingle" in hand trying to rape them......Hmmmmmmm

                                                  #2.45 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:57 PM EST
                                                  AmericanConscience

                                                  Correction, Sudan not Yemen offered up Bin Laden;

                                                  Bill Clinton ignored repeated opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist allies and is responsible for the spread of terrorism, one of the ex-president’s own top aides charges.

                                                  Mansoor Ijaz, who negotiated with Sudan on behalf of Clinton from 1996 to 1998, paints a portrait of a White House plagued by incompetence, focused on appearances rather than action, and heedless of profound threats to national security.

                                                  Ijaz also claims Clinton passed on an opportunity to have Osama bin Laden arrested.

                                                  Sudanese President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, hoping to have terrorism sanctions lifted, offered the arrest and extradition of bin Laden and "detailed intelligence data about the global networks constructed by Egypt's Islamic Jihad, Iran's Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas,” Ijaz writes in today’s edition of the liberal Los Angeles Times.

                                                  These networks included the two hijackers who piloted jetliners into the World Trade Center.

                                                  But Clinton and National Security Adviser Samuel "Sandy” Berger failed to act.

                                                  ”I know because I negotiated more than one of the opportunities,” Ijaz writes.

                                                  ”The silence of the Clinton administration in responding to these offers was deafening."

                                                    #2.46 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:02 PM EST
                                                    Lynn-410457

                                                    Greg, I know you are being like a middle school pubescent boy. I really have no opinion about you other than you are really a silly boy, who spends alot of time on here trying to irritate someone that is probably old enough to be his Grandmother. Sorry, you do not have a life, maybe its your attitude.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #2.47 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:00 PM EST
                                                    AZPADDY

                                                    Lynn

                                                    I think it might be his Ilk....

                                                      #2.48 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:01 PM EST
                                                      Reply
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      Increasingly I hear more and more voices insisting that Barack Obama and his administration, along with his enablers in Congress, are pushing patriots in the heartland closer to the brink of the type of resistance


                                                      • 12 votes
                                                      #3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:57 PM EST
                                                      clarke ong

                                                      Patriots don't do that type of resistance. We call that type of resistance "terrorism"

                                                      • 45 votes
                                                      #3.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:55 PM EST
                                                      rls8r

                                                      Sometimes we call that type of resistance 'murder'.

                                                      • 25 votes
                                                      #3.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:19 PM EST
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      I think it is interesting that the conservative media claimed Obama's and congress words push some to violence then deny that the words spewed in the conservative echo chamber has any effect.

                                                      • 20 votes
                                                      #3.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:22 PM EST
                                                      NativeAmerican-1289371

                                                      The shooter was a raving loon. He would have shot the Congresswoman even if a goddam Republican was president. Can we stop injecting politics into this?

                                                      • 7 votes
                                                      #3.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:44 PM EST
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      Can we stop injecting politics into this?

                                                      As soon as politicians quit lying.

                                                      • 15 votes
                                                      #3.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:48 PM EST
                                                      sandra-359026

                                                      are you hearing voices in your head increasingly, the people pushing the violence are pushing it at Barack Obama he's not pushing violence at anyone. This sheriff is absolutley correct. WORDS coming from people in power have consequences, and when those people in power use WORDS that influence or incite people to violence in order for they themselves to have monetary gain, without regards to what the consequences of their words are then that person is dispicible. This sheriff is saying what we've been thinking for a long time. Have you personally ever tried just being nice to others, even others who don't have your same idea's. Have you ever looked at someone else's ideas with an open mind. But then from your message you only hear your own voice.

                                                      • 14 votes
                                                      #3.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:54 PM EST
                                                      henry1966

                                                      Can we stop injecting politics into this?

                                                      Although I have the tendency to agree with you it'speople like Limbaugh and Beck who are politically and ethically wrong all the time. Talking politics is inevitable.

                                                      It's even seeded under " Politics "

                                                      • 16 votes
                                                      #3.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:07 PM EST
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      are you hearing voices in your head increasingly,

                                                      I'm assuming that is directed at Anthony Martin of the Colombia conservative examiner, the author.

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      #3.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:08 PM EST
                                                      sandra-359026

                                                      no its directed at you.

                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #3.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:13 PM EST
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      no its directed at you.

                                                      Then you will have to explain what your getting at because I have no Idea.

                                                      Something else Martin said in the article that I do agree with:

                                                      Perhaps it is time for the arrogant ones in government to back off, step back, take a deep breath, and carefully consider the consequences that their actions and statements may well produce among concerned citizens


                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #3.10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:27 PM EST
                                                      QuiteContrary-1278233

                                                      When the "concerned citizens" you refer to happen to be murderous nut jobs- why should society pander to them? Should we simply do nothing- ever- to improve the condition of our country for the many, because of the fear of ruffling the feathers of the angry, dangerous and maladjusted? That should never even be considered as a solution, I for one do not wish to have my freedoms blackmailed or extorted from me by home-grown terrorists!

                                                      • 9 votes
                                                      #3.11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:35 PM EST
                                                      WmRAllen

                                                      I think it is interesting that the conservative media claimed Obama's and congress words push some to violence then deny that the words spewed in the conservative echo chamber has any effect.

                                                      It is an odd little bit of prior interpretation, isn't it?

                                                      Perhaps it is time for the arrogant ones in government to back off, step back, take a deep breath, and carefully consider the consequences that their actions and statements may well produce among concerned citizens

                                                      Problem is, everybody has a different list of "arrogant ones in government", don't they? And on the other hand, no one wants to consider that their favorites could be less than lily-pure...

                                                      • 4 votes
                                                      #3.12 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:00 AM EST
                                                      reddirthippy

                                                      Problem is, everybody has a different list of "arrogant ones in government"

                                                      So true my guess is about 70% overall and 90% of this that have been there for more than one term.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #3.13 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:20 AM EST
                                                      Deb-658853

                                                      I'd have to agree with that 90%!

                                                        #3.14 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:52 PM EST
                                                        Lynn-410457

                                                        Redirthippy, I don't thinks its wise for you to be on a public forum, talking revolution. Especially now. What do you all hope to accomplish with that? Do you honestly think that you would not be on the losing end of that in everyway?

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #3.15 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:16 PM EST
                                                        reddirthippy

                                                        talking revolution????

                                                        I'm thinking you might have missed the point.

                                                          #3.16 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:53 AM EST
                                                          Lynn-410457

                                                          Reddirt, Refer to post #3 and inform us what you meant in reference to resistance? Maybe I did take it wrong, but the right fighters have spewed revolution since Obama was elected so I naturally took resistance to mean what you have talked for 2 1/2 yrs.

                                                            #3.17 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:21 AM EST
                                                            reddirthippy

                                                            You do realize those words were from a conservative paper and author and i posted it to show the contradictions.

                                                            read 3.3 I thought it was clear maybe not.

                                                              #3.18 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:17 AM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              River-239955

                                                              They're all idiots....with obscene salaries.

                                                              *grumbles

                                                              • 6 votes
                                                              Reply#4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:08 PM EST
                                                              SciThinker

                                                              I commend this gentle man for using this tragedy to stick our noses in the poop that has spewed from our mouths and litters the floor of the american political carpet. Don't retreat, Sheriff Dupnik...Maintain civility and keep telling it like it is.

                                                              • 48 votes
                                                              Reply#5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 PM EST
                                                              agagnu

                                                              I applaud this gentleman for saying what his experience has taught him. After two odd years its high time the air is cleared of the stench of foxfart(ers) and the noise of limpbark(ers).

                                                              • 22 votes
                                                              #5.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:02 PM EST
                                                              Max in MD

                                                              A sheriff with decades of public service versus a blow hard millionaire with years of human disservice. Sheriff Dupnick is my new hero.

                                                              • 21 votes
                                                              #5.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:23 PM EST
                                                              wwaugh

                                                              Sheriff: You stated it right do not retreat. Sarah you were wrong!

                                                              • 7 votes
                                                              #5.3 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:51 AM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              TheJonesGirl

                                                              Since Dupnick didn't use the words "right wing" or anything indicting the right specifically, why are they so upset? Are they feeling a little guilt? Do they see themselves reflected in Dupnick's admonishments? If so, that is their own fault and no one else's.

                                                              • 50 votes
                                                              Reply#6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:35 PM EST
                                                              SciThinker

                                                              I totally agree, Jonesgirl.

                                                              • 29 votes
                                                              #6.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:39 PM EST
                                                              sms29s66

                                                              Jones, good point. Funny how quickly they recognized themselves.

                                                              • 31 votes
                                                              #6.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:01 PM EST
                                                              Rich-2229277

                                                              TheJonesGirl,

                                                              They are upset because they did not think to bring it up first, so attack it!

                                                              • 18 votes
                                                              #6.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:20 PM EST
                                                              DEBEKI

                                                              I listened to this Sheriff several times on CNN, MSNBC and (spirits help me) Fox.

                                                              At no time, until this article, has he mention ANY PARTY AFFLIATION. He has only expressed his displeasure of the enormity of hate rhetoric and pundit misinformation, distortions and lies that have been raging on radio and tv 24/7. He should know his own state and he should know what he hears daily.

                                                              I took his initial statements to mean - ALL hateful rhetoric - although with the target map of Gabby Giffords district, the person who ran against her inviting people to the firing range to shoot her off the ballot, her office being vandalized and the total misinformation ranging from immigration to health care has promoted rage and anger in his state has probably put him and all law enforcement on edge.

                                                              I also find it funny that the right came out in full force to damn this man's words and at the same time slam him for his concern for his citizens and his state when all he wants is for the hate, the lies, the distortions, the misinformation, et. al. to STOP. Yep, I would say the guilty are crying "What - Who me????"

                                                              Got to hand it to the right wing - stir the pot and then play the victim...

                                                              I noticed Sarah took the opportunity to cry to Glenn Beck where they both played "professional victim" so aptly, instead of owning their own cupability. I guess Rush must have felt left out of the "pity party" and needed a hug from the rabid right.

                                                              I think this Sheriff is a hero and I am proud of him. Keep on keeping on Sheriff - I applaud you with a big standing ovation.

                                                              • 40 votes
                                                              #6.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:25 PM EST
                                                              Take that back.

                                                              Greg: F-a-u-x p-a-s Not faupa!

                                                              King Dave: I love your definition of religion. Priceless.

                                                              • 5 votes
                                                              #6.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:34 PM EST
                                                              greg-709692

                                                              Greg: F-a-u-x p-a-s Not faupa!

                                                              If it's this:

                                                              "Fat and Ugly People Assembly"

                                                              it is. LOL!

                                                              It's more this though:

                                                              http://everquest2.com/Befallen/Faupa/

                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              #6.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:43 PM EST
                                                              Arlene Tognetti

                                                              JonesGirl,

                                                              exactly....Agreed with you!

                                                              Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, he is good guy and smart and aware

                                                              and he knows Arizona and the "%$!@BS THAT GOES ON

                                                              Bravo to Sheriff Clarence Dupnik for his courage and truth

                                                              • 9 votes
                                                              #6.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:43 PM EST
                                                              Veralto

                                                              JonesGirl, Americans don't feel responsible we're just sick and tired of the dupniks using tragedy and other events to demagogue anything the left-wing does not agree with.

                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #6.8 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:02 AM EST
                                                              TheJonesGirl

                                                              Hey, Ver, how do you feel about the Right having used 9/11 politically since the evening of the tragedy?

                                                              • 8 votes
                                                              #6.9 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:28 AM EST
                                                              Deb-658853

                                                              That's not why, even if you wish it was. And he wasn't that neutral about it either. He is a Democrat and his words didn't hide that fact one tiny bit. Sheriff Dupnik is not a good guy. He's a jerk trying to point the finger away from himself to people who were not at fault even in the slightest. He is at fault. This man should never have been able to pass a background check for a gun. If it was in the database that he was under mental health care, he would not have a gun.

                                                                #6.10 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:57 PM EST
                                                                TheJonesGirl

                                                                Deb, no amount of your spin changes that Dupnick said nothing about the right, they, out of guilt, assumed it was about them. The righties are afraid that this will mean a big loss to them, that they might be forced to take the blame and bear responsibility for once.

                                                                What do you suggest, that we lock up anyone thought to have a mental issue?

                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                #6.11 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:29 PM EST
                                                                greg-709692

                                                                no amount of your spin changes that Dupnick said nothing about the right

                                                                Sure he did and so did Chris Matthews!

                                                                http://www.mofopolitics.com/2011/01/11/az-sheriff-clarence-dupnik-no-doubt-in-my-mind-rush-limbaugh-talk-radio-connected-to-giffords-shooting/

                                                                  #6.12 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:41 PM EST
                                                                  TheJonesGirl

                                                                  He said that AFTER Rush spoke up.

                                                                  Gee, I wonder why Rush thought Dupnik was speaking to him and his words in his first remarks? Feeling a bit guilty, Rush?

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #6.13 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:28 PM EST
                                                                  Deb-658853

                                                                  I would suggest JonesGirl, that the sheriff do his job properly. There were enough complaints to press some sort of charges. There were enough complaints about him being unstable that they could have at least brought him in for an interview or evaluation. That is not an arrest and is perfectly legal to do. At that point they would have known he had serious mental health issues. That would have shown up on the computer when he went to buy a gun and wouldn't have been able to buy a gun. Now the sheriff is trying to point fingers at others because he doesn't like their politics and also to save his own butt. He dropped the ball, plain and simple.

                                                                  There is proof of what I am claiming, there is NO proof of what you are claiming. So who is spinning here?

                                                                    #6.14 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:35 PM EST
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    Lynn-410457

                                                                    This is one smart man. People ought to listen to him out there insead of Jan Brewer and some of those other hair brained people that are currently in office. He seems to me to have a helluca lot of Common sense.

                                                                    • 32 votes
                                                                    Reply#7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:47 PM EST
                                                                    Smith Cassidy

                                                                    Ugh...Brewer makes me cringe.

                                                                    • 17 votes
                                                                    #7.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:56 PM EST
                                                                    Ryan-

                                                                    Yeah...very smart...tainting a jury pool.

                                                                    He's going to end up with a gag order if he doesn't stop talking.

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #7.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:59 PM EST
                                                                    jade1

                                                                    Civility, civility, civility! That sounds good, let's all try that for a change!

                                                                    • 18 votes
                                                                    #7.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:06 PM EST
                                                                    Smith Cassidy

                                                                    Ryan-
                                                                    Yeah...very smart...tainting a jury pool.

                                                                    He's going to end up with a gag order if he doesn't stop talking.

                                                                    WTF?

                                                                    You think a jury might find Loughner (sp?) innocent? The entire NATION is tainted.

                                                                    Ahh, so there goes Dupnik's Freedom of Speech, is that right?

                                                                    • 28 votes
                                                                    #7.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:10 PM EST
                                                                    Ryan-

                                                                    Smith Cassidy, no I don't think he is innocent, but making the comment he is unstable is a comment that was very irresponsible. Do you not agree, considering his press conference is reaching contention jurors.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #7.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:18 PM EST
                                                                    ingenjon

                                                                    This is one smart man. People ought to listen to him out there insead of Jan Brewer and some of those other hair brained people that are currently in office. He seems to me to have a helluca lot of Common sense.

                                                                    I dont know how the hell you can say that when in reality, his assessments arent based on facts. The guy who did the shooting is who is responsible, not right wing radio. If anything he's a leftist.

                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                    #7.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:21 PM EST
                                                                    Maricopa County Resident

                                                                    The guy who did the shooting is who is responsible, not right wing radio. If anything he's a leftist.

                                                                    I think this the type of statement this whole seed is about; you were fine right up to the first comma, then you digressed.

                                                                    • 17 votes
                                                                    #7.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:38 PM EST
                                                                    rls8r

                                                                    "...but making the comment he is unstable is a comment that was very irresponsible."

                                                                    Why? - words don't really mean anything. Nobody will take him seriously. I'm sure he just meant it as a metaphor.

                                                                    Didn't it take only a few people to knock him over? That's what the sheriff means by 'unstable' - easy to knock over.

                                                                    • 14 votes
                                                                    #7.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:24 PM EST
                                                                    Lynn-410457

                                                                    Ryan, Oh really well lets just see who is believed and what happens. I do not believe it will be what you are trying to push through.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #7.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:13 PM EST
                                                                    Ryan-

                                                                    Lynn, what am I pushing through?

                                                                    Sorry I don't agree with you that this is a smart man.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #7.10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:54 PM EST
                                                                    QuiteContrary-1278233

                                                                    Legally, there is a big gap between unstable and insane. The criteria for an insanity defense is very rigid concerning the accused's ability to judge right from wrong and to also aid in their own defense, this is rather difficult to do unless there is prior evidence of mental disease or defect- not statements by former high school classmates looking for their 15 seconds of fame.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #7.11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:58 PM EST
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    concerned67

                                                                    Most Republicans bow to Limbaugh. They are scared to death of this guy. How many Republicans have ever criticised him? The few that has round up apologizing to him the next day. They are scared to death of the guy. It is good to see somebody having balls enough to point the finger where it belongs.

                                                                    • 27 votes
                                                                    Reply#8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:00 PM EST
                                                                    Rich-2229277

                                                                    That is not true about most Republicans bow to Limbaugh! After many years of service in our Army I have learned to keep my enemies close! What a Rush!

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #8.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:22 PM EST
                                                                    MaryEllen Galloway

                                                                    #8.1:That is not true about most Republicans bow to Limbaugh!

                                                                    Yes it is!

                                                                    • 13 votes
                                                                    #8.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:26 PM EST
                                                                    Lynn-410457

                                                                    Concerned 67, You are right. When was the last time one of them challenged his ravings? Remember when Karl Rove came out and spouted off about Christine O'Donell? He was silenced quickly and then changed his story. Thats an example of the big bag of drugs, influence. All the dummie have to do is band together and fight him, he has the power they give him.

                                                                    • 8 votes
                                                                    #8.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:16 PM EST
                                                                    Davegstein

                                                                    Ya I agree.Most Republicans are pussies....cant even disavow,disown or clean out the loonies from their own back yard.These are the caliber of people some want at the helm of this nation??

                                                                    Might as well set out on a three hour tour with the skipper and Mary-ann

                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                    #8.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:29 PM EST
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    demo scout

                                                                    Dupnik's right. Conservatives know that their propaganda promotes these violent breaks with reality by vulenerable unstable folks. But they don't care. They just want to escape the blame. A lot of the bigots in this country are anxious to see more violence and actively work to provoke it. It is a common but stupid strategy by hate groups to plan to provoke a race war by committing some act of outrageous violence. This is exactly what Al Quaeda did in Iraq when it blew up Mosques to turn Sunnis and Shia violently against each other.

                                                                    • 21 votes
                                                                    Reply#9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:30 PM EST
                                                                    DarthVSchw

                                                                    They might as well start wearing red shirts, just so we know when they are coming so we can duck....

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #9.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:16 PM EST
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    Jack 4

                                                                    This brave Sheriff is calling a spade, a spade.

                                                                    Sheriff Dupnik, I'm with you 100% with your comments.

                                                                    • 31 votes
                                                                    Reply#10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:41 PM EST
                                                                    Ggap

                                                                    Most Republicans bow to Limbaugh

                                                                    Absolutely; and while they are in that submissive position, can't resist sniffing his, what seems to be, fat, foul smelling a$$.

                                                                    • 17 votes
                                                                    Reply#11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:44 PM EST
                                                                    Grey Haired Sage

                                                                    Kudos to Sheriff Dupnik for telling it like it is, even though the teapublicans don't want to hear it.

                                                                    • 21 votes
                                                                    Reply#12 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:46 PM EST
                                                                    steven-791492

                                                                    This fine Sheriff is just standing taller and taking the crap.... good for him. Nice to see someone with a backbone.

                                                                    • 25 votes
                                                                    Reply#13 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:51 PM EST
                                                                    Michael Kervin

                                                                    The Sheriff needs to listen to the President, the legislature and his conscience in toning down the rhetoric. It does no one any good. He has spoken his peace and opinion and I respect him for that but enough. All this does is open speculation by his opponents to disect apart his staff as to whether they reacted into the past relative to concerns over the suspect. i refuse to name this coward and assassin. In terms of gray haired Sages point of view above, where was he back in '08 when President Obama stated they can bring a knife and we'll bring a weapon, or in "04 when the Dem's had the same idiotic map and imagery that Sarah palin had, and on....and on...and on...on both sides.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    Reply#14 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:54 PM EST
                                                                    agagnu

                                                                    No Michael, this Sheriff is stopping the upflow of sluice plunging down the deep to pull the drainplug.

                                                                    He needs all the support and encouragement to stop the overflow. He is doing it for the good of his town and for the nation.

                                                                    • 16 votes
                                                                    #14.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:17 PM EST
                                                                    Veralto

                                                                    Michael, you're so right! This Sheriff is an embarrassment to the profession of law enforcement not less. He has tainted his name forever. His name is now a noun to describe left-wing demagoguing that goes on all over the MSM, Internet, and in politics. Read this short article about the "dupniks".

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #14.2 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:09 AM EST
                                                                    Jake319

                                                                    Veralto

                                                                    Then who do we get our information from, who can be trusted?

                                                                    Talk show host who dodge the draft, quit their jobs, claim that those who are not with them are the enemy?

                                                                    I read the definition of his name. That only mirrors the racsim that the right wears as a badge of righteousness. Look up the definition for " delusional".

                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                    #14.3 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:30 AM EST
                                                                    Veralto

                                                                    Jake, there is nothing delusional about the slanderous vitriol you left-wing dupniks dish-out every hour of the day.

                                                                    I know when I hear opinion and weigh the opinion against my own worldview; after-all that's where opinions come from. The right-wing is not racist, that is a slander...that is a card played by dupniks with low intellectual capacity.

                                                                      #14.4 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:15 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      RI Mom

                                                                      Mr. Limbaugh gets paid BIG BUCK for his inflammatory trash talk.

                                                                      Now the extremist in the Right are going to bully the Sheriff.

                                                                      If you think that Mr. Limbaugh doesn't incite anger and fear....then you know nothing about civility.

                                                                      BTW: ENOUGH with all the "bring a knife" postings...it is tiresome.

                                                                      All of you who keep repeating that line should just get together and go out for coffee.

                                                                      • 19 votes
                                                                      Reply#15 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:06 PM EST
                                                                      bestquest

                                                                      Perhaps we should view Limbaugh as an entertainer. Although I prefer the antics of the Marx brothers, I do understand folks sitting around the family radio listening to his opinions and being persuaded to listen in again tomorrow.

                                                                      Time for us to grow up, listen and read FACTUAL presentations, then decide what is best for our nation, village and family. Til then, lowest common denominator rules.

                                                                      I'll continue with the LaPlace transforms.

                                                                      Maybe if members of congress had breakfast with each other a few times a week and got to know each other, some of the harsh charges would diminish. But, they need breakfast to fund raise.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #15.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:41 PM EST
                                                                      Jake319

                                                                      That was the way congress use to do business. Now, the talk show host says that if you work together you are consorting with the enemy. The environment that the has been created by mass media only benefits the people that own it.

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      #15.2 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:38 AM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Philip Grant

                                                                      Listen to me!!

                                                                      I'm an old school Liberal from back in the days. In the late sixties and seventies when it was our side who had people who were spewing hatred and calling for violence. I remember it well.

                                                                      WORDS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.

                                                                      Many knee jerk young radicals were killed, and killed innocent people back then, listening to loud mouthed BS artist, and they didn't even have the benefit of the Internet, face book, twenty four hour news, and all the rest of the communications we have now.

                                                                      It's one thing to have a legitimate cause, and a legitimate grievance. Everyone has a right to state their case as loud and as often as they choose, but this constant and continuous mean spirited, and violent toned talk will have consequences. That's just the way it is. Not everyone is stable.

                                                                      • 18 votes
                                                                      Reply#16 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:07 PM EST
                                                                      commoner2010

                                                                      I remember the 60's too, and one thing that I think may be a bit different is that there were actually organizations such as the SDS and Black Panther's that had identifiable leadership who could and would respond publically. I am thinking that people are not discerning the difference between the acts when "random violence" occurs and when identifiable resistance movements are acting out. It is the lone shooter acting out with no or little warning that is a very big concern. IMHO We need better health care access, more teeth in some of the existing regulating agencies, etc. I just listened to Maddow read a huge list of news articles about lone gunmen. Most of these gunmen were under 30 years of age. As a person who has worked with men coming out of prison, I think it is generally understood that if a person doesn't commit violent acts before their early 30's, they probably won't, or if they have, they most likely won't repeat. Peoples brains are still developing into their 20's, so they may well be easily swayed or intimidated by polarizing information. Dupnick was absolutely spot on.

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      #16.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:25 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Tom-VermillionOhio

                                                                      The Sheriff did NOT say a single word about what side was sprewing the poison rhetoric. UNTIL LAST NIGHT!!! For all we know, he could have thinkingabout those left-wing 'yaks' when he said what he said initially. So here comes the right-wing 'yaks'. What this clearly demonstrates IS the right-wing 'yaks' knows what they are doing WITH INTENT to infuriate the public body. They in as much admitted thier long held agenda. That is to cause public unrest to achieve their goal of reason to take over this country. It is a cabal, plain and simple. Folks, what you are seeing here is the brain child of David and Charles Koch, Rupert Murdock and various other Executives in key areas of our economy attempting to take over our country entirely! And none of them (except David Koch, 1980) are or were ever on an election ballot!!!

                                                                      From Glenn Beck's Blackboard:

                                                                      STEP 1: Form a 'shadow government'- - - -David & Charles Koch's function, since Reagan

                                                                      STEP 2: Control the Airwaves- - - -Rupert Murdock's objective every since he became a US citizen

                                                                      STEP 3: Destabilize the State- - - -What's Murdock-Koch's 'TEA Party' really all about?

                                                                      STEP 4: TAKE POWER- - - -Take Control of Both the House & Senate & Supreme Court AND the Executive Branch in 2012- - - - What do you have folks?

                                                                      Note that they can write and pass any law, good or bad, that they want to. And there will be NOT a damn thing any of us can do about it. Kiss our democracy goodbye. Take a good hard look at what the GOP lobbyists have derailed in terms of legislation when they were in control since the 1980s. Everything that was meant to benefit and protect us ordinary American Citizens. Conservatives, Please Dear God, Lord Jesus...Wake Up. The GOP-TEA Party is flat out using you to con you out of your vote to get them into complete power. You have been duped. We all have been duped. Once they gain control of our country AND our all powerful military, our freedom AND liberty will be gone. Flat out gone. Please open your eyes and see.

                                                                      • 20 votes
                                                                      Reply#17 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:14 PM EST
                                                                      MaryEllen Galloway

                                                                      #17:The GOP-TEA Party is flat out using you to con you out of your vote to get them into complete power. You have been duped. We all have been duped. Once they gain control of our country AND our all powerful military, our freedom AND liberty will be gone. Flat out gone. Please open your eyes and see.

                                                                      If more people felt like me, the repugs would not stand a snowball's chance in hell of holding political office! I have been awake for over 60 years to their meanness, dispirited insanity and greed. They never change and never plan to. No matter what they promise.

                                                                      I wish some of you could have asked my father to recount why he felt the way he did. My father lived through the Great Depression of 1929 and I believe his every word and iota- that was enough for me. His words have not failed me yet; he taught his children well. And I believe him more so than I will ever believe anything these repugs say. No way, no how!

                                                                      • 14 votes
                                                                      #17.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:47 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      IndependentVoter

                                                                      King Dave

                                                                      Asking people to believe an attempted political assassination was not politically motivated, is INSANE

                                                                      Really? Then I will wait for your analysis of the political motivation of John Hinckley, Jr. and his attempt on the life of the President. This should be good...spin Jodie Foster into a political statement...LOL

                                                                      Hinckley is nuts....so is Loughner. Period.

                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                      Reply#18 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:15 PM EST
                                                                      RI Mom

                                                                      Oh crap...

                                                                      what is our beautiful America coming to when some of these posters defend Rush Limbaugh over the voice of reason from a Sheriff who is in the trenches (not a studio) every day?

                                                                      Craziness.

                                                                      • 20 votes
                                                                      Reply#19 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:17 PM EST
                                                                      Rowdytroute

                                                                      RI Mom

                                                                      The Sheriff has the guts to stand up and protect the citizens of Pima Co. AZ. and our US Govt... and you are right he is in the trenches....not on a computer or in a studio preaching hatred of America 24/7.....

                                                                      Bravo to Sheriff Dupnik..

                                                                      • 12 votes
                                                                      #19.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:33 PM EST
                                                                      RI Mom

                                                                      Rush acts as if HE was a victim in this mayham of murder & maiming.

                                                                      • 11 votes
                                                                      #19.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:13 PM EST
                                                                      henry1966

                                                                      Rush acts as if HE was a victim in this mayham of murder & maiming.

                                                                      Rush will act whatever suits him best.

                                                                      • 10 votes
                                                                      #19.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:32 PM EST
                                                                      TheJonesGirl

                                                                      6 dead including a child, 14 injured and the usual folks on the right line up to complain that they are victims.

                                                                      I think most will be repulsed by this.

                                                                      • 11 votes
                                                                      #19.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:38 PM EST
                                                                      MaryEllen Galloway

                                                                      #19.2:Rush acts as if HE was a victim in this mayham of murder & maiming.

                                                                      Fatburger-goulashrush always plays the victim, this is how he succeeds! What else can he do? This is how he attracts sympathy and forgiveness to the moronic followers who pay him for his hateful and racist diatribes.

                                                                      It is a game for him and his co-dependents at faux! He still laughs all the way to the bank, although I can finally see the checking account being reduced!

                                                                      At last, he has gone overboard- or as my parents would say "sheeted and stepped in it!

                                                                      • 7 votes
                                                                      #19.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:59 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Rowdytroute

                                                                      The Sheriff is correct, he realized early on that he and his Dept. and citizens of Pima Co., AZ. are in danger due to the constant hatred and rhetoric coming from radio, tv, and some congressional members....it's all on video tape........

                                                                      right now I am for letting the authorities handle the crime scene.....Plenty of time for lawyers to sort out which hate speakers are the most responsible.....

                                                                      the only way to stop these US Govt. haters is to hit them in the pocketbook.......

                                                                      • 9 votes
                                                                      Reply#20 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:18 PM EST
                                                                      It Aint So

                                                                      I dont think anyone actually "hates" the government. We extremely dislike some of the rules, regs, and yes, that always-popular slow response time we always seem to get when seeking a solution.

                                                                      But if someone says they hate the government, you want to hit them in the pocketbook? How? Fine somebody for exercising their right to free speech?

                                                                      The government is necessary in some areas - but quite simply its to do the things I cant do by myself, like form a military, build public roads and highways, etc.

                                                                      But that a-hole of a sheriff needs to cut out the rhetoric himself - I listened to it, and it wasnt hateful, but he makes it clear what side of the aisle he is on, and I think thats unprofessional.

                                                                      He needs to be investigating why one of his own shot and killed a bunch of people - not doing TV shows.

                                                                        #20.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:07 PM EST
                                                                        Rowdytroute

                                                                        IAS...............A-hole of a sheriff needs to cut out rhetoric himself

                                                                        Why us a-hole to describe a person who is honorable and elected by the citizens of AZ. You certainly are not helping the rhetoric....speak from one side of your mouth and turn around and use hate speech from the other side of your mouth.......

                                                                        Amazing that you never mentioned the dead and wounded in AZ. That says volumes to me.....

                                                                        freedom of speech does not come without responsibilities and accountability.....

                                                                        Sheriff Dupnik has twice the backbone as anyone who has the responsibility to protect his citizens......I guess that is why the rightwingers are attacking him...He actually has a backbone and speaks with honest candor.....The US Govt haters do not like that....

                                                                        • 7 votes
                                                                        #20.2 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:27 AM EST
                                                                        Jake319

                                                                        Ias
                                                                        So why does he need to shut up? The words he says must pain the devote followers of talk radio. The question in you mind must be does this negative divisive nature of talk radio do anything for your country?
                                                                        Well....

                                                                        The climate of fear has one objective only to reduce the turn out at the polls. Jim Crow methods have always been a part of the GOP.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #20.3 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:53 AM EST
                                                                        AmericanConscience

                                                                        Jake, who are you to judge the value of anything with regard to the country or society? People like you wanted to take Rock & Roll off the air because it was described as

                                                                        that colored devil music that makes white girls want to @!$%# @!$%#s

                                                                        It was people like you that forbade television showing blacks and whites together, blacks in positions of authority, or blacks as anything but comedic clowns that tapped danced and told silly stories

                                                                        I is sposs'd to tell dem silly shuck and jive jokes so's yall white folk don get too nervois.....shunuff suh

                                                                        It was people like you that wanted to burn books that didn't have Moral Value to society, black list writers and actors in Hollywood for being UN American, why Jake, you and Senator McCarthy are blood brothers in the idea that the value of speech must be determined before we can allow that speech! Maybe we should resurrect the Un American Panels and have Congress start their Witch hunts again?

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #20.4 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:02 PM EST
                                                                        Michelle-340891

                                                                        Am Cons: There's a big difference between calling Rock and Roll "colored devil music" and showing cross-hairs on a person's face and telling people not to retreat, reload, or putting their name on a target and inviting your constituents to shoot at it. Would it be okay to put a target on Palin's head and use the same kind of violent rhetoric she uses? That would be okay with Palin? Or Beck, or Limbaugh or the rest of the right? No, it would NOT be okay to target someone on the right in this way, and it is NOT okay when the rightwingers do it to the left. It's uncivilized and uncouth and DANGEROUS. Not to mention that it has NOTHING to do with actually debating the issues using reason and logic.

                                                                        Back in the 60's, the right said the EXACT SAME THING about the violent rhetoric from the left, and they were right. The shoe is now on the other foot. It's up to our so-called "leaders" to step up and say that violent rhetoric and demonizing an opponent has no place in civilized political discourse. No one blames the right for the shooting ... we only blame the right for using the imagery and words that may INCITE the mentally disturbed. After all, when you tell a violent, paranoid psychotic that someone is out to get them, you've just drastically increased the chances that that person will be attacked in some way.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #20.5 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:30 PM EST
                                                                        AmericanConscience

                                                                        Would it be okay to put a target on Palin's head and use the same kind of violent rhetoric she uses

                                                                        Certainly, any rhetorical form of dramatic exaggeration to convey a point, sell a product, or motivate a constituency is fine with me. By your reckoning, Beer commercials are hate speech, and beer commercials are responsible for alcoholism, drunk driving fatalities, and sexual assault; we know they represent all of these issues, especially during the Superbowl. In fact, domestic violence goes up significantly during the Superbowl, in direct correspondence to the amount of Beer commercials. I find these commercials dangerous and offensive; are you advocating eliminating all Beer commercials, or, having the Government preview the content for offensive material prior to broadcast? Better yet, I find advertising for Fast Food to be hate speech, and pandering to the poor and disenfranchised. Furthermore, because of Fast Food commercials presenting underage skinny, healthy people having suggestive sexual encounters due to eating a Big Mac, Im loving it, you will join with me in demanding that all Fast Food commercials be censored. I find certain works of literature offensive, any Afro-centric works that convey racial confrontation I feel are hate speech. I am sure that you will join me in advocating that all works of literature be previewed and redacted to eliminate offensive language or content?

                                                                        Where will it end when we begin down the slippery slope of silencing certain speech or expression because it offends; when we are in the streets protesting our enslavement? That is what the founders envisioned, free speech being the FIRST amoung endowed rights.

                                                                        This shooter was ill, he could just as well of watched Tron or Avatar and massacred people, and then you would be right up there with Joe McCarthy, resurrecting the Un-American activities Commission?

                                                                          #20.6 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:50 PM EST
                                                                          Michelle-340891

                                                                          Am Con: Wow. You think that, according to me, beer commercials are "hate speech"?!? Wow is all I can say. THAT is what you got from what I wrote?!? The only answer I can make is: take your meds. You're delusional, much like Palin and her perpetual "I'm the victim in this" stance, and adding insult to injury when she brought up the whole "blood liable" travesty (as someone with actual Jewish ancestry, I can tell you that it was inappropriate and disgusting for her to USE that phrase as a description of her ongoing victimhood). You're under the mistaken delusion that I actually think that Palin is responsible for the shooting. I do not. But I think there ARE some RESPONSIBILITIES with free speech. People like Palin, Angle, Kanjorski (a Dem, I might add) and others, who use violent imagery instead of rational debate should have NO place in civilized society.

                                                                          Your "right" to free speech ENDS the second that it infringes on another person's right to NOT LIVE IN FEAR. Using violent imagery is nothing more than BULLY-ISM, THREATS, and TERRORISM. It has NO PLACE in democratic debate, regardless of WHO is using that imagery. It would be wrong if Obama were to do it, it is wrong when Palin does it. PERIOD.

                                                                          And by the way, I'd have to say that bringing up McCarthy is interesting, considering the FACT that the rightwingnuts in the House (like King) want to start investigating ALL Muslim Americans (not that they actually believe that Muslim Americans are "real" Americans, and in fact have outright said they aren't). Bauchmann wants Congress (apparently only the Dems, mind you) investigated for "unamerican" views -- not that she'll tell us what those views are, or who she believes should be targeted. But it's the left that wants to bring back McCarthyism?!? Really? You do need meds, don't you? There's a psychological term for what you're guilty of. It's called "TRANSFERENCE." Seek professional help.

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #20.7 - Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:55 PM EST
                                                                          Reply
                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                          The left also should be coming down hard on him and asking him to step down. He was spewing Rhetoric, so the hypocrite that he is....

                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                          #21 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:19 PM EST
                                                                          maximillio

                                                                          -1,000 for reading comprehension, BB. "Hateful" is the modifier that he used. Did you miss that word?

                                                                          • 11 votes
                                                                          #21.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:27 PM EST
                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                          Max

                                                                          What are you talking about?

                                                                          I just made an opinion didn't attach anyone's remark...So you need to grade my comprehension? I have heard the man speak...and he spewed hate for the Right.

                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                          #21.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:33 PM EST
                                                                          Rahlly

                                                                          Oh wow, according to you we should condemn him for saying "Stop the hate!"

                                                                          Now there's a low blow... ::shaking head::

                                                                          • 13 votes
                                                                          #21.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:42 PM EST
                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                          Rahlly

                                                                          He was spewing hate for the Right...Not really saying anything about the facts..'

                                                                          He is a Sheriff...not someone to put out accusations...

                                                                          AS YOU SEE...HE IS WRONG....

                                                                          The kid acted on his on mis-guided mind. Sarah Palin, Rush, Fox News, nor

                                                                          any other Republican had control of this guys mind.

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #21.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:11 PM EST
                                                                          Rahlly

                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                          Rahlly

                                                                          He was spewing hate for the Right...Not really saying anything about the facts..'

                                                                          The right attacked HIM when he said that there was heated rhetoric. He never pointed to anyone, he didn't name names, he didn't blame it on the right. The right attacked HIM at that point. Last night, he mentioned those on the right who had already attacked him and said they were fanning the flames. How is that hate for the right?

                                                                          If they hadn't attacked him, he wouldn't have said them.

                                                                          • 12 votes
                                                                          #21.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:31 PM EST
                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                          Rahlly

                                                                          I heard him when he gave his first speech. He made it into a political

                                                                          problem...when he shouldn't have. As I said, I bet he was trying to

                                                                          push the problem somewhere else and take it away from the Sheriff

                                                                          dept. where it belongs.

                                                                            #21.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:42 PM EST
                                                                            Rahlly

                                                                            In a news conference Saturday evening, Dupnik condemned the "atmosphere of hatred and bigotry" that he said has gripped the nation and suggested that the 22-year-old suspect being held in the shooting was mentally ill and therefore more susceptible to overheated messages in the media.

                                                                            "There's reason to believe that this individual may have a mental issue. And I think people who are unbalanced are especially susceptible to vitriol," he said during his televised remarks. "People tend to pooh-pooh this business about all the vitriol we hear inflaming the American public by people who make a living off of doing that. That may be free speech, but it's not without consequences."

                                                                            Exactly what is political about that? What is partisan? Point out where in his first speech he blames the right? Guess what, he didn't! He blamed the heated political arena and that's all.

                                                                            • 10 votes
                                                                            #21.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:47 PM EST
                                                                            BB-375952

                                                                            Point out where in his first speech he blames the right?

                                                                            I believe that I made myself clear that he didn't name names in his first speech,

                                                                            but turned it into something political...We don't care about his political views, he

                                                                            is a Sheriff for goodness sake..His job is to catch criminals...Wonder what he is

                                                                            really hiding...Is he guilty of something he has overlooked about this young man? HMMMMMM

                                                                              #21.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:51 PM EST
                                                                              Davegstein

                                                                              BB.....you just plain dumb........end of story

                                                                              • 8 votes
                                                                              #21.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:40 PM EST
                                                                              BB-375952

                                                                              Dave

                                                                              I hate to break it to you....but I am certainly not dumb...just don't agree with you! If I were a citizen of Pima County I would be asking for his resignation..

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #21.10 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:01 PM EST
                                                                              Rahlly

                                                                              If he didn't name names and he sure didn't insinuate anyone because he didn't even ALLUDE to any specific person, group, or party... please explain how it is that he made this into an attack on the right?

                                                                              • 10 votes
                                                                              #21.11 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:13 PM EST
                                                                              QuiteContrary-1278233

                                                                              I believe that the right automatically assumed that he was referring to the them, because, well IT'S TRUE!

                                                                              • 7 votes
                                                                              #21.12 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:58 AM EST
                                                                              BB-375952

                                                                              Rahlly

                                                                              Quite Contrary

                                                                              If he didn't name names and he sure didn't insinuate anyone because he didn't even ALLUDE to any specific person, group, or party... please explain how it is that he made this into an attack on the right?

                                                                              Did he even need to name names? He was bringing politics into something that he himself didn't even know the facts...but it is seeming that I may have been right all along...he is hiding something trying to sway this situation in another direction...WE will learn more...

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #21.13 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:57 AM EST
                                                                              Rahlly

                                                                              He knew more of the facts than you since he is a part of the investigation. Also, the idea that he was insinuating something is ridiculous. He said what he said that the violent rhetoric had created an atmosphere that certainly influenced Loughner. Note, he didn't blame the atmosphere for the problem, yet somehow people are able to read into his words what they see rather than what he said.

                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                              #21.14 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:27 AM EST
                                                                              Matt in MN

                                                                              He said what he said that the violent rhetoric had created an atmosphere that certainly influenced Loughner.

                                                                              And as Mr. Dupnik, this is entirely within his rights. As Sheriff Dupnik, he should not have said it. As Sheriff Dupnik - he is a representative of the judicial branch of government - and judicially - he should not have offered non-factual comments while representing himself as the judicial branch of government.

                                                                                #21.15 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:47 AM EST
                                                                                BB-375952

                                                                                Rahlly

                                                                                Please don't treat me like I am not smart enough know that he himself was spewing accusations. Did he know whether or not the kids was influenced by Political Rhetoric...IF he did he should have shown proof...he was just using political reasoning when he was suppose to be investigating the real reason...Had he been a republican saying that this "NUT" was being influenced by Obama saying "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." You would be fired up and angry...Now how close to the truth am I now?

                                                                                  #21.16 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:49 AM EST
                                                                                  Rahlly

                                                                                  BB-375952

                                                                                  Rahlly

                                                                                  Please don't treat me like I am not smart enough know that he himself was spewing accusations. Did he know whether or not the kids was influenced by Political Rhetoric...IF he did he should have shown proof...he was just using political reasoning when he was suppose to be investigating the real reason...'

                                                                                  I'm trying to work it out logically, BB and apparently you are one who make assumptions. I treated you with all due respect and yet you sit there condescending to me. I pointed out and will continue to rationally, reasonably, and without rancor point out that the Sheriff made no political statements. People like loughner tend to rant, so even if they don't speak TO the LEO's, they speak. As well, they had evidence of his postings, bloggings, videos... all of which were full of violent rhetoric. Not to mention, even if they didn't have that, the Sheriff pointed out that the presence of violent rhetoric may have influenced is not so bad. Look at what's been happening recently. Roeder killed Tiller and became a folk hero to some. This idolizing of such people only help support the violent rhetoric. Hinckley shot Reagen to impress Foster. Why? Because he wanted his name known for this. So could it be simpley that Loughner wanted his name known, yes... but his target most likely was influenced by the constant repeated and pushed images of targets on people.

                                                                                  Your idea that Dupenik's comment was political is too strange to comprehend... mainly because it is likely he made that comment to indirectly ask the pundits with their rage to back off.

                                                                                  Had he been a republican saying that this "NUT" was being influenced by Obama saying "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." You would be fired up and angry...Now how close to the truth am I now?

                                                                                  Far from it, very far. Because that wasn't the quote. Not to mention he was paraphrasing not only a well known quote but one from a movie. He made that comment before his presidency and he apologized when people got offended. And no I wouldn't be fired up and angry because the truth of the matter is bringing a gun isn't firing one. Isn't that what the right keeps saying? That bringing their guns to town halls and rallys are not the same as firing one? So according to that, Obama's comment isn't tantamount to saying 'shoot them' is it?

                                                                                  BB, stop being so defensive. No one accused anyone until the right decided it applied ONLY to them. We know that it happens on both sides, the difference as far as I can see is that the majority comes from the right with no self-control. While those on the left do smack ours when they are that flipping dumb.

                                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                                  #21.17 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:13 PM EST
                                                                                  TheJonesGirl

                                                                                  No one accused anyone until the right decided it applied ONLY to them.

                                                                                  If someone says something that makes one react defensively, the one reacting needs to figure out why he feels defensive--perhaps because of guilt?

                                                                                  Innocent people don't feel a finger pointing at them when someone points out undesirable words or deeds.

                                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                                  #21.18 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:33 PM EST
                                                                                  BB-375952

                                                                                  BB, stop being so defensive. No one accused anyone until the right decided it applied ONLY to them. We know that it happens on both sides, the difference as far as I can see is that the majority comes from the right with no self-control. While those on the left do smack ours when they are that flipping dumb.

                                                                                  This is so wrong....so wrong....I am flipping dumb-founded by this statement...Me being defensive no one has accused anyone until the right decided it applied to them...Are you thinking I am flipping stupid????? WHAT???? I would love to say something else to you, but only because I respect the code, and not you....I will refrain.

                                                                                  This thing got way out of hand. So you are saying all of you Liberals, far left NUTS, just decided to jump on the band wagon with this guy because he wasn't talking about any certain political party? Are you kidding me????? Look I never fell off a turnip truck...if you think I am buying this opinion of yours. That idiot sheriff...didn't respect his badge by getting into a political mode when all those people were killed and injured and if you can't see that...then there is a problem.

                                                                                    #21.19 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:25 PM EST
                                                                                    BB-375952

                                                                                    If someone says something that makes one react defensively, the one reacting needs to figure out why he feels defensive--perhaps because of guilt?

                                                                                    and JonesGirl it didn't take him till another speech to start naming who he was blaming...again who doesn't have the correct information. The Right is not GUILTY of anything...They didn't cause this shooting...the NUT I would bet has never heard of Rush, Sarah and the Reason he knows Giffords she is in his district and he went to see her and asked a question and I think she blew him off...Made him angry and he was out to get her...Not becaue of the Right...Understand???

                                                                                      #21.20 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 PM EST
                                                                                      TheJonesGirl

                                                                                      So, BB, you'd rather wait until someone commits a mass shooting and credits the Right before condemning their rhetoric?

                                                                                      Dupnik only mentioned Rush the next time because Rush had spoken out. It sure seems that the Right are feeling very guilty. Innocent people don't get all flustered when someone mentions inappropriate speech/actions. Those with guilty heads and hearts do.

                                                                                      • 4 votes
                                                                                      #21.21 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:31 PM EST
                                                                                      Reply
                                                                                      dcford

                                                                                      the reality that the shooter is mentally ill would seem to preclude a jury trail.

                                                                                      Have him declared a danger to others AND to himself...confine him to a mental institution..done by a federal judge as he committed a federal ctrime.

                                                                                      Doris

                                                                                        Reply#22 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:36 PM EST
                                                                                        Scuromondo

                                                                                        The headline is a bit misleading. I heard the sheriff speak, and he didn't "blast" anyone. He sincerely expressed his opinion (and he was very clear that it was his own opinion) that he thought Limbaugh was very wrong. No blasting at all.

                                                                                        • 13 votes
                                                                                        Reply#23 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:37 PM EST
                                                                                        BB-375952

                                                                                        I heard the sheriff speak, and he didn't "blast" anyone.

                                                                                        This goes to show what a different set of

                                                                                        ears will hear...I heard him and he couldn't wait to blast the Right and

                                                                                        blame them for something this young man did...I would think the Sheriff should

                                                                                        be more interested in the shooting, the facts, and the victims, instead of placing blame on a

                                                                                        Political Party..Not very professional on his part.. btw...I didn't need Rush to tell me that.

                                                                                        I don't even listen to him.

                                                                                          #23.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:49 PM EST
                                                                                          reddirthippy

                                                                                          No blasting at all.

                                                                                          You would think KOS would have used a different word when complaining rhetoric. Other possible stupid titles.

                                                                                          Sheriff Right on Target

                                                                                          Marksmen Sheriff hits 10 on Rush

                                                                                          Sheriff blows up the right

                                                                                          Sheriff places crosshairs on Rush

                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                          #23.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:00 PM EST
                                                                                          sandra-359026

                                                                                          Well BB you are just the type of personality that the words of violence influence. Your brain is steeped in propaganda and you can't distinguish right from wrong. Any person in power whether it is media power or political power does influence people, especially if that person is mentally unstable to start with. That influence should be used for the good of all people, not for the monetary gain, or political gain of themselves. And this country is supposed to be the country the rest of the world looks up to and admires so we should hold ourselves to a higher standard of decency. Instead this country has been torn apart by people who don't listen, who don't care, and who are using the media to brain wash people who don't think.

                                                                                          • 7 votes
                                                                                          #23.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:10 PM EST
                                                                                          BB-375952

                                                                                          Sandra

                                                                                          Excuse me?

                                                                                          You know my personality?

                                                                                          You don't even know me.. I gave an opinion about the Sheriff.

                                                                                          and in my opinion his job is to help and try to solve the

                                                                                          killing and not speculate on his OPINION. WHO CARES what he thinks? I know I don't.

                                                                                            #23.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:14 PM EST
                                                                                            reddirthippy

                                                                                            try to solve reasons of the killing

                                                                                            Isn't that what he was saying??

                                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                                            #23.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:20 PM EST
                                                                                            Snag

                                                                                            The problem is that in our vitriolic society, most listen with their ideology ,instead of their hearts

                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                            #23.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:33 PM EST
                                                                                            Reply
                                                                                            liberalism is a lieExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                                            This loud mouth democrat sheriff should be held accountable for slander for making accusations about people and groups of people with absolutley no evidence to back up his claims. A sworn law enforcement officer is not allowed make public accusations without having hard evidence to back it up. This guy is an idiot.

                                                                                            • 8 votes
                                                                                            Reply#24 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:50 PM EST
                                                                                            sandra-359026

                                                                                            b.s

                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                            #24.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:11 PM EST
                                                                                            liberalism is a lie

                                                                                            b.s. = "briliant statement" I assume?

                                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                                            #24.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:16 PM EST
                                                                                            henry1966

                                                                                            Below Standards>

                                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                                            #24.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:33 PM EST
                                                                                            liberalism is a lie

                                                                                            Im not sure that is possible. Liberal standards are so low I dont think you can get below them.

                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                            #24.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:34 PM EST
                                                                                            DEBEKI

                                                                                            People are tired of the hate and the call to arms and the shouts of secession and revolution, take back their country, over throw the tyranny that is our government, gold is the only currency (sorry, I had to reference Beck's sponsor - cheap shot - I know - but I had to because Jared "the shooter" also referenced Beck's sponsor - "Gold/silver is the only currency" in his YouTube ramblings - sounded like Beck to me - same kind of ramblings)......

                                                                                            water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants and patriots, bullets not ballots, socialist, marxist, facist, communist, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Gansta government, constituents must be armed and dangerous, revolution is a good thing every now and then.....

                                                                                            I wonder if everyone realizes...

                                                                                            WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT.

                                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                                            #24.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:11 PM EST
                                                                                            BB-375952

                                                                                            This loud mouth democrat sheriff should be held accountable for slander for making accusations

                                                                                            This was collapsed what happened to this person's freedom to speak?

                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                            #24.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:16 PM EST
                                                                                            Lkessler

                                                                                            Same question from me, BB. The post did not violate any COH rules.

                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                            #24.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:51 PM EST
                                                                                            Veralto

                                                                                            wow Liberal is a lie, you really tore open a hornets nest with these dupniks!

                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                            #24.8 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:04 AM EST
                                                                                            Jake319

                                                                                            I think you over look the fact that the sheriff had to be informed about the threats that the congresswoman had received from official reports within own dept.

                                                                                              #24.9 - Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:27 PM EST
                                                                                              Reply
                                                                                              tmac-425222

                                                                                              The Sheriff is putting a magnifying glass right on Limbaugh, and Limbaugh can't stand the heat.

                                                                                              • 10 votes
                                                                                              Reply#25 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:04 PM EST
                                                                                              It Aint So

                                                                                              Limbaugh isnt complaining at all....he thinks its pretty sad that the sheriff isnt doing what he's supposed to be doing.

                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                              #25.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:10 PM EST
                                                                                              tmac-425222

                                                                                              Isn't complaining? Surely, you jest!

                                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                                              #25.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:20 PM EST
                                                                                              It Aint So

                                                                                              I listened to some of his show today...trust me, he's not complaining.

                                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                                              #25.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:31 PM EST
                                                                                              henry1966

                                                                                              listened to some of his show today..

                                                                                              Were you drunk? ;-)))

                                                                                              • 7 votes
                                                                                              #25.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:33 PM EST
                                                                                              It Aint So

                                                                                              No, Henry, but I did have a hangover...

                                                                                                #25.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:48 PM EST
                                                                                                reddirthippy

                                                                                                sad that the sheriff isnt doing what he's supposed to be doing.

                                                                                                and of course rush is an expert in the duties of an Arizona sheriff.

                                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                                #25.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:15 PM EST
                                                                                                henry1966

                                                                                                No, Henry, but I did have a hangover...

                                                                                                That explains it :)

                                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                                #25.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:31 PM EST
                                                                                                Davegstein

                                                                                                Aintso was listening to his show today.....that explains everything...

                                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                                #25.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:43 PM EST
                                                                                                Reply
                                                                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                                                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                                                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                                                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                                FUN STUFF:
                                                                                                • Leaderboard |
                                                                                                • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                                                • Top of the Vine |
                                                                                                • Newsvine Live |
                                                                                                • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                                                • The Greenhouse |
                                                                                                COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                                                • Code of Honor |
                                                                                                • Company Info |
                                                                                                • Contact Us |
                                                                                                • Jobs |
                                                                                                • User Agreement |
                                                                                                • Privacy Policy |
                                                                                                • About our ads
                                                                                                LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                                                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com